Enhancing Enhancing High School Learning Management Systems Through Explainable AI-Based Behavioral Analytics for Personalized Learning Support

Authors

  • Yaya Sudarya Triana Universitas Mercu Buana
  • Nurhasanah Universitas Mercu Buana
  • Hadi Santoso Universitas Mercu Buana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61255/decoding.v4i3.1676

Keywords:

Behavioral learning analytics, Explainable AI, Learning management system, Personalized learning support, SHAP

Abstract

Purpose – This study develops an Explainable AI (XAI)-enhanced Learning Analytics framework for analyzing student learning behaviors in a senior high school Learning Management System (LMS) and supporting retrospective performance-risk identification using score-independent behavioral features.
Methods – The study analyzed 57,095 LMS quiz activity records from 111 students collected between July 2024 and October 2025. Seven behavioral variables were initially engineered, while Answer Accuracy, Learning Consistency, and Learning Efficiency were excluded from predictive modeling because they are derived from score-related information. The final models used Quiz Frequency, Learning Duration, Activity Level, and Dominant Study-Time Pattern. Random Forest, Decision Tree, and Logistic Regression were evaluated, with SHAP TreeExplainer used for interpretation.
Findings – Decision Tree achieved the highest accuracy (73.9%), macro F1-score (0.638), and macro ROC-AUC (0.771) on the 23-student test set. Random Forest achieved 69.6% accuracy, 0.631 macro F1-score, and 0.669 macro ROC-AUC, while Logistic Regression achieved 56.5%, 0.455, and 0.656, respectively. Learning Duration had the highest mean absolute SHAP value.
Research Implications – The results indicate that score-independent behavioral features provide a limited-to-moderate signal for retrospective performance classification. Prospective early-warning utility requires temporal validation.
Originality – The study integrates XAI with behavioral Learning Analytics while explicitly separating score-independent predictors from the score-derived target to support interpretable educational decision-making

Abstract views: 55 , PDF downloads: 47

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mukul, E., & Büyüközkan, G. (2023). Digital transformation in education: A systematic review of education 4.0. Technological forecasting and social change, 194, 122664.

Bradley, V. M. (2021). Learning Management System (LMS) use with online instruction. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(1), 68-92.

Nirsal, N. (2025). Digital Transformation Through Learning Management System Implementation In Secondary Schools: Analysis Of Impact, Challenges, And Adaptation Strategies. MSJ: Majority Science Journal, 3(3), 268-275.

J o, I. H., Park, Y., Yoon, M., & Sung, H. (2016). Evaluation of online log variables that estimate learners’ time management in a Korean online learning context. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(1), 195-213.

Matcha, W., Uzir, N. A. A., Gašević, D., & Pardo, A. (2019). A systematic review of empirical studies on learning analytics dashboards: A self-regulated learning perspective. IEEE transactions on learning technologies, 13(2), 226-245.

Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Rogers, T., & Gasevic, D. (2016). Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: The effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. The Internet and higher education, 28, 68-84.

Tsai, Y. S., Moreno-Marcos, P. M., Tammets, K., Kollom, K., & Gašević, D. (2018, March). SHEILA policy framework: informing institutional strategies and policy processes of learning analytics. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 320-329).

P alanci, A., Yılmaz, R. M., & Turan, Z. (2024). Learning analytics in distance education: A systematic review study. Education and Information Technologies, 29(17), 22629-22650.

Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y. K. (2020). Utilising learning analytics to support study success in higher education: A systematic review. Educational technology research and development, 68(4), 1961-1990.

Yau, J. Y. K., & Ifenthaler, D. (2024). Human-centred learning analytics and AI in education: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100203.

Gunasekara, S., & Saarela, M. (2024). Explainability in educational data mining and learning analytics: An umbrella review. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 887-892).

Türkmen, G. (2025). The review of studies on explainable artificial intelligence in educational research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(2), 277-310.

Holstein, K., Aleven, V., & Rummel, N. (2020, June). A conceptual framework for human–AI hybrid adaptivity in education. In International conference on artificial intelligence in education (pp. 240-254). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Gomez, M. J., Armada Sanchez, A., Albaladejo‐González, M., Garcia Clemente, F. J., & Ruipérez‐Valiente, J. A. (2025). Utilising explainable AI to enhance real‐time student performance prediction in educational serious games. Expert Systems, 42(3), e70008.

Janahi, Y., & Obeidat, M. (2025). Predictive Analytics and AI in Education A Systematic Literature Review on Identifying and Supporting At-Risk Students.

Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2019). Co-designing a real-time classroom orchestration tool to support teacher-AI complementarity. Grantee Submission.

Khor, E. T., & K, M. (2023). A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in supporting personalized learning. Education sciences, 14(1), 51.

Hur, P., Lee, H., Bhat, S., & Bosch, N. (2022). Using machine learning explainability methods to personalize interventions for students. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (p. 438)..

Paolucci, C., Vancini, S., Bex II, R. T., Cavanaugh, C., Salama, C., & de Araujo, Z. (2024). A review of learning analytics opportunities and challenges for K-12 education. Heliyon, 10(4).

Verbert, K., Ochoa, X., De Croon, R., Dourado, R. A., & De Laet, T. (2020, March). Learning analytics dashboards: The past, the present and the future. In Proceedings of the tenth international conference on learning analytics & knowledge (pp. 35-40).

Altukhi, Z. M., & Pradhan, S. (2025). Systematic literature review: Explainable AI definitions and challenges in education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.02910.

Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2024). Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey. arXiv.

Tiukhova, E., Vemuri, P., López Flores, N., Islind, A. S., Óskarsdóttir, M., Poelmans, S., Baesens, B., & Snoeck, M. (2024). Explainable Learning Analytics: Assessing the Stability of Student Success Prediction Models by Means of Explainable AI. Decision Support Systems, 182, 114229.

Alfredo, R., Echeverria, V., Jin, Y., Yan, L., Swiecki, Z., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2024). Human-centred learning analytics and AI in education: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100215.

Cukurova, M., & Miao, F. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO Publishing.

McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2021). Educational design research: Portraying, conducting, and enhancing productive scholarship. Medical education, 55(1), 82-92.

Drugova, E., Zhuravleva, I., Zakharova, U., & Latipov, A. (2024). Learning analytics driven improvements in learning design in higher education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(2), 510-524.

Bergdahl, N., Bond, M., Sjöberg, J., Dougherty, M., & Oxley, E. (2024). Unpacking student engagement in higher education learning analytics: a systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 63.

Sarker, I. H. (2021). Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions. SN computer science, 2(3), 160.

Stinar, F., Xiong, Z., & Bosch, N. (2024). An Approach to Improve" k"-Anonymization Practices in Educational Data Mining. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 16(1), 61-83.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-10

How to Cite

Triana, Y. S., Nurhasanah, & Hadi Santoso. (2026). Enhancing Enhancing High School Learning Management Systems Through Explainable AI-Based Behavioral Analytics for Personalized Learning Support. Journal of Deep Learning, Computer Vision and Digital Image Processing, 4(3), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.61255/decoding.v4i3.1676

Issue

Section

Articles