Students’ Errors in Solving Integer Multiplication and Division Word Problems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61255/itej.v4i2.1453Keywords:
Error analysis, Integer operations, Newman’s Error Analysis, Student errors, Word problemsAbstract
This study aims to describe the types of errors and the factors causing such errors made by Grade VII students at SMPN 19 Palu in solving word problems involving multiplication and division of integers. Mathematics education plays a vital role in developing students’ reasoning abilities; however, many students still encounter difficulties in operations with integers, particularly in solving contextual problems. Although Newman’s Error Analysis has been widely applied, research that thoroughly examines the errors of junior high school students in word problems on integer multiplication and division remains limited, especially in the context of Indonesian students using the Newman’s Error Analysis framework. This research employs a qualitative descriptive approach, involving two Grade VII students as research subjects. Data were collected through written tests and interviews, then analyzed using the Miles and Huberman model with reference to the procedures of Newman’s Error Analysis: reading errors, comprehension errors, transformation errors, process skill errors, and encoding errors. The findings identified four types of errors: comprehension, transformation, process skill, and encoding errors, while no reading errors were found. Comprehension errors occurred because students failed to identify all relevant information presented in the problems, while transformation errors stemmed from an inability to convert verbal information into mathematical models. Process skill errors resulted from careless calculations, which in turn led to errors in writing the final answers. No reading errors were found among any of the subjects. This study enhances understanding of the characteristics of student errors in the context of word problems on integer operations at the junior high school level. The findings highlight the importance of instruction that emphasizes understanding word problems, constructing mathematical models, and developing the habit of rechecking calculations, so that errors at every stage of problem solving can be minimized.
Abstract views: 30
,
PDF downloads: 17
Downloads
References
Ario, M., Suhendra, Jupri, A., & Nurlaelah, E. (2025). Students' errors and learning obstacles in solving algebraic word problems: Hermeneutic phenomenology. Education Sciences, 15(12), 1674. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15121674
Bulan, D. D. (2025). Newman's error analysis dalam pembelajaran matematika berbasis aktivitas luar ruangan dengan MathCityMap. Mudabbir: Journal Research and Education Studies, 5(2), 1788–1803. https://doi.org/10.56832/mudabbir.v5i2.1407
Ekasari, A., & Putra, D. (2024). Error analysis of learners' problem-solving abilities in mathematics courses: A Newman error analysis (NEA) approach. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 12(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.17977/2442-3904.1019
Ghefira, A. M., & Jupri, A. (2025). Newman's error analysis on junior high school students' mathematical problem-solving ability in the Pythagorean theorem. Mathline: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4), 913–928. https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v10i4.1033
Heryati, N., Wijaya, C., & Jannah, L. M. (2026). The dynamic governance for basic education access of Indonesian migrant workers' children in Malaysia. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 45(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v45i1.91176
Hokor, E. K., Apawu, J., Owusu-Ansah, N. A., & Agormor, S. (2022). Preservice teachers' misconceptions in solving probabilistic problems. Pedagogical Research, 7(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1334619
Hoth, J., Larrain, M., & Kaiser, G. (2022). Identifying and dealing with student errors in the mathematics classroom: Cognitive and motivational requirements. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1057730
Jukiewicz, M. (2024). The future of grading programming assignments in education: The role of ChatGPT in automating the assessment and feedback process. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52, 101522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101522
Kusmaryono, I., Aminudin, M., Ubaidah, N., & Chamalah, E. (2024). The bridging understanding of language and mathematical symbols between teachers and students: An effort to increase mathematical literacy. Infinity Journal, 13(1), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i1.p251-270
Marcel, H., Sihotang, W., Sitindaon, D. M., Maruli, N., Saing, T., Grace, L., Silalahi, L., Sinaga, D., Simanullang, M. C., Studi, P., Matematika, P., Matematika, F., & Alam, P. (2025). [Judul artikel belum tersedia]. [Nama jurnal belum tersedia], 5(2), 591–606.
Marqozi, M., Widiati, I., Andrian, D., & Masruroh, F. (2023). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal pada materi bilangan bulat kelas VII SMP N 1 Senayang. Journal of Research in Science and Mathematics Education (J-RSME), 2(2), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.56855/jrsme.v2i2.267
Nasrun, Prahmana, R. C. I., & Akib, I. (2023). The students' representative processes in solving mathematical word problems. Knowledge, 3(1), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge3010006
Nurjanah, P., & Angraini, L. M. (2024). Analysis of students' mathematical problem-solving in translating story problems into mathematical models. Progressive of Cognitive and Ability, 3(4), 230–250. https://doi.org/10.56855/jpr.v3i4.1105
Pinheiro, M. M., & Santos, V. (2025). Integrating computational thinking and artificial intelligence into mathematics education: A pathway for the 21st-century. In A. Reis, J. P. Cravino, L. Hadjileontiadis, P. Martins, S. B. Dias, S. Hadjileontiadou, & T. Mikropoulos (Eds.), Technology and innovation in learning, teaching and education (pp. 82–92). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-02675-0_7
Ramadhan, D., & Santoso, E. (2025). [Judul artikel belum tersedia]. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 26, 2321–2342.
Rerek, E. A., Hermiati, K., & Suprihatiningsih, S. (2025). Analysis of students' conceptual understanding ability in solving word problems on basic statistics. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3), 577–586. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v5i3.3473
Sahrudin, S. (2025). Implementation of Islamic leadership values by school principals in enhancing teacher competence in public junior high schools in Indramayu. Eduprof: Islamic Education Journal, 7(1), 140–161. https://doi.org/10.47453/eduprof.v7i1.348
Schulman, K., & Demantowksy, M. (2022). Teacher students' beliefs about and strategies for dealing with students' misconceptions. J-READING Journal of Research and Didactics in Geography, (2). http://www.j-reading.org/index.php/geography/article/view/339
Semenov, A. L., Abylkassymova, A. E., & Polikarpov, S. A. (2023). Foundations of mathematical education in the digital age. Doklady Mathematics, 107(1), S1–S9. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064562423700564
Taamneh, M. A., Díez-Palomar, J., & Mallart-Solaz, A. (2024). Examining tenth-grade students' errors in applying Polya's problem-solving approach to Pythagorean theorem. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(12), em2551. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15707
Ye, H., Liang, B., Ng, O.-L., & Chai, C. S. (2023). Integration of computational thinking in K–12 mathematics education: A systematic review on CT-based mathematics instruction and student learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00396-w
Zhang, Q., & Fiorella, L. (2023). An integrated model of learning from errors. Educational Psychologist, 58(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2149525
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sheila Ananda, Nurhaydi Nurhaydi, Tegoeh S Karniman, I Nyoman Murdiana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
