Enhancing Descriptive Writing through Canva-Supported Think Talk Write: A Classroom Action Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61255/itej.v4i2.1590Keywords:
Canva, Classroom Action Research, Cooperative Learning, Descriptive Writing, Think Talk WriteAbstract
This study examined the integration of the Think Talk Write (TTW) model and Canva as a technology-supported instructional strategy for improving students’ descriptive writing and supporting their classroom engagement. A classroom action research design based on Lewin’s cyclical framework was implemented across two instructional cycles involving 31 seventh-grade students. Data were collected through descriptive writing assessments, classroom observations, instructional documentation, and informal conversations, and were analyzed using descriptive quantitative and qualitative approaches. The findings showed progressive improvement in students’ descriptive writing achievement across the intervention cycles. The proportion of students meeting the minimum mastery criterion increased from 32.25% at baseline to 61.29% in Cycle I and 93.54% in Cycle II, accompanied by a substantial increase in mean writing scores. Classroom observations also indicated greater participation in group discussion, increased willingness to express ideas, and greater independence in completing writing tasks as the intervention progressed. The findings suggest that sequencing individual thinking, collaborative discussion, and writing through TTW, followed by a Canva-supported publication activity and targeted individual guidance, can provide a supportive instructional environment for descriptive writing. Rather than demonstrating the independent causal effect of either TTW or Canva, this study contributes a classroom-based pedagogical model that integrates cooperative learning, digital publication, and individualized support within an iterative writing intervention. Further controlled studies across broader educational settings are needed to examine the effectiveness and generalizability of this integrated approach.
Abstract views: 0
,
PDF downloads: 0
Downloads
References
Abdel Latif, M. M. M., Alghizzi, T. M., & Alshahrani, T. M. (2024). The impact of genre-based instruction on Saudi university students’ English writing performance and motivation: A mixed-method study. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1387009. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1387009
Bai, B., Guo, W., & Wang, C. (2024). Relationships between struggling EFL writers' motivation, self-regulated learning (SRL), and writing competence in Hong Kong primary schools. Applied Linguistics Review, 15(1), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2020-0131
Cahyono, B. Y., Irawati, R., Amalia, S. N., & Hidayat, L. E. (2024). Project-based learning in EFL educational settings: A meta-analysis study in EFL/ESL writing. Journal of Writing Research, 16(1), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2024.16.01.04
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Universitas Terbuka. (2007). Alat Penilaian Kemampuan Guru (APKG 1 dan APKG 2): Pemantapan Kemampuan Profesional [instrument documentation]. Universitas Terbuka.
Dmitrenko, N., Shkola, I., Saliuk, B., Panchenko, V., & Neshko, S. (2024). Canva platform: Visual content for developing writing skills of prospective engineers in ESP classes. Vide. Tehnologija. Resursi – Environment, Technology, Resources, 2, 358–363. https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2024vol2.8075
Dost, G. T. (2026). Changes in preservice English teachers' writing demotivation and writing self-efficacy following a genre-based writing intervention. Review of Education, 14(2), Article e70169. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70169
Florence, E. A., & Kolski, T. (2021). Investigating the flipped classroom model in a high school writing course: Action research to impact student writing achievement and engagement. TechTrends, 65(6), 1042–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00662-0
Ghufron, S., Nafiah, Syahruddin, Kaswadi, & Mustofa. (2023). The effect of STAD-type cooperative learning based on a learning tool on critical thinking ability in writing materials. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.1614a
Hafidzin, H. K., Muzammil, L., & Sulistyo, T. (2024). The effectiveness of the Canva application in enhancing students’ writing proficiency across learning styles. Edulitics (Education, Literature, and Linguistics) Journal, 9(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.52166/edulitics.v9i2.7958
Hafner, C. A., & Ho, W. Y. J. (2020). Assessing digital multimodal composing in second language writing: Towards a process-based model. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47, Article 100710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100710
Jaja. (2024). Research trends on students’ writing skills: A bibliometric analysis using Scopus database. Journal of Language and Education, 10(3), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2024.18806
Jamal, S., Syamsuddin, & Taufik, M. (2018). Kemampuan menulis teks deskripsi berdasarkan pengamatan langsung kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Dungguminasa Kabupaten Gowa. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 3(1), 1–12.
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
Lathifah, U. (2023). Canva tools: Desain andalan sejuta umat. Yayasan Insan Cendekia Indonesia Raya.
Le, A. N. N., Bo, L. K., & Nguyen, N. M. T. (2023). Canva-based e-portfolio in L2 writing instructions: Investigating the effects and students’ attitudes. CALL-EJ, 24(1), 41–62.
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
Mardiana, N., Ahmad, D., & Sari, A. A. I. (2022). Examining the skill in writing descriptive text among Indonesian learners of English: The effects of task-based language teaching (TBLT). Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1301.06
Mejia, M. (2024). Metawriting: Empowering students to discover their knowledge of writing. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(1), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.202423833
Moldoveanu, M., Dubé, F., Giguère, M.-H., & Grenier, N. (2021). Les retombées de la participation d’enseignantes du primaire à un projet de recherche-action au sujet de la mise en oeuvre de pratiques différenciées d’enseignement de l’écriture sur leur développement professionnel. Canadian Journal of Education, 44(2), 405–433. https://doi.org/10.53967/cje-rce.v44i2.4681
Moro Ramos, S. (2024). Canva as a tool to promote meaningful learning in the teaching of English as a foreign language. European Public and Social Innovation Review, 9. https://doi.org/10.31637/EPSIR-2024-869
Mulyati, Y., & Hadianto, D. (2023). Enhancing argumentative writing via online peer feedback-based essay: A quasi-experiment study. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16212a
Mustika, M., Yeh, C. Y. C., Cheng, H. N. H., Liao, C. C. Y., & Chan, T.-W. (2025). The effect of mind map as a prewriting activity in third grade elementary students' descriptive narrative creative writing with a writing e-portfolio. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(2), Article e70006. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70006
Nguyen, T. N. T., & Oanh, D. T. K. (2025). Cooperative learning and its influences on student engagement. Cogent Education, 12(1), Article 2513414. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2513414
Nurkamto, J., Prihandoko, L. A., Putro, N. H. P. S., & Purwati, O. (2024). Academic writing apprehension in higher education: A systematic review. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(1), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i1.28928
Parkhouse, H., Gorlewski, J., Senechal, J., & Lu, C. Y. (2021). Ripple effects: How teacher action research on culturally relevant education can promote systemic change. Action in Teacher Education, 43(4), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2021.1896395
Pratolo, B. W., Bao, D., & Palaguna, S. (2025). Enhancing reading comprehension and motivation through Think-Pair-Share: Classroom action research in an Indonesian EFL context. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 8(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v8i1.13992
Rabgay, T., & Kidman, G. (2023). Multiple iterations and messiness in the implementation of action research by Bhutanese secondary science teachers. Discover Education, 2, Article 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-023-00077-4
Ramdhani, R., & Kuswari, U. (2024). Think-Talk-Write learning model to improve the skills of writing personal experiences. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2023) (pp. 402–407). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-376-4_53
Regan, K., Evmenova, A. S., Hughes, M. D., Rybicki-Newman, M. P., Gafurov, B., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2021). Technology-mediated writing: It’s not how much, but the thought that counts. E-Learning and Digital Media, 18(5), 480–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753021996387
Retnowati, D., Mulyanto, R., & Purnami, S. (2025). Exploring of Canva in improving writing skills in English subjects. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology, 5(1), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.52088/ijesty.v5i1.629
Sauhenda, A. F., Marnina, Riwu, L., Habeahan, N. L. S., & Santo, Z. (2020). Development of language capability assessment instrument in writing descriptive text based on local wisdom. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3452144.3453739
Siregar, R. N., Suryadi, D., & Prabawanto, S. (2025). Increasing students representation ability through a cooperative learning of think talk write type. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3285(1), Article 030002. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0264022
Sulaiman, W. Z. W., Ali, Z., Ali, Z. M., Shahid, S. H., Ishtiaq, M., & Bakar, N. A. (2025). Using Canva and Microsoft Teams to support students’ writing tasks. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(4), 3295–3303. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i4.27985
Tang, J. T., Mo, D., & Lan, W. C. (2025). Exploring the integration of cooperative learning in blended teaching environments. Education and Information Technologies, 30(18), 26931–26959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13791-3
Xiao, M., Zuo, M., Liu, X., Wang, K., & Luo, H. (2025). After-school behaviors, self-management, and parental involvement as predictors of academic achievement in adolescents. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2), Article 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020172
Yeung, P.-S., Chung, K. K.-H., Chan, D. W.-O., & Chan, E. S.-W. (2025). Relationships of writing self-efficacy, perceived value of writing, and writing apprehension to writing performance among Chinese children. Reading and Writing, 38(1), 225–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10512-z
Yu, S., Zhou, N., & Jiang, L. (2025). Secondary students' L2 writing motivation and engagement: The impact of teachers' instructional approaches and feedback practices. Applied Linguistics Review, 16(1), 537–563. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0200
Zhai, X., & Razali, A. B. (2023). Triple method approach to development of a genre-based approach to teaching ESL/EFL writing: A systematic literature review by bibliometric, content, and scientometric analyses. SAGE Open, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221147255
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Iqbal, Agus Wartiningsih, Henny Sanulita, Antonius Totok Priyadi, Martono

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
