Enhancing Elementary Students’ Understanding of the Solar System through Smart TV and Solar Scope Integration: A Classroom Action Research Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61255/itej.v4i2.1669Keywords:
Classroom Action Research, IPAS Learning, Learning Outcomes, Smart TV, Solar ScopeAbstract
This study was motivated by students’ low conceptual understanding and learning outcomes in the Solar System topic within Integrated Science and Social Studies (IPAS) learning at SDN 101 Bungo. The predominance of conventional teaching methods and the limited use of interactive media made it difficult for students to comprehend abstract scientific concepts. Therefore, this study aimed to improve students’ learning outcomes and classroom engagement through the implementation of Smart TV-based learning media integrated with the Solar Scope system. This research employed a Classroom Action Research design based on the Kemmis and McTaggart model, which consisted of two cycles involving planning, action, observation, and reflection. The participants were 25 sixth-grade students. Data were collected through achievement tests, classroom observations, and documentation and were analyzed using both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The findings revealed a substantial improvement in students’ academic achievement and learning activities. The average score increased from 65 in the pre-action stage to 70 in Cycle I and reached 85 in Cycle II. Similarly, the percentage of students achieving learning mastery improved from 52% to 60% and finally to 92%. Students also demonstrated higher levels of participation, interaction, collaboration, and motivation during the learning process. These findings indicate that the integration of Smart TV and Solar Scope provides meaningful visual experiences that facilitate students’ understanding of abstract concepts and promote more student-centered learning. Consequently, this instructional innovation can serve as an effective alternative for enhancing elementary science education in the digital era.
Abstract views: 18
,
PDF downloads: 12
Downloads
References
Abdulrahaman, M. D., Faruk, N., Oloyede, A. A., Surajudeen-Bakinde, N. T., Olawoyin, L. A., Mejabi, O. V., Imam-Fulani, Y. O., Fahm, A. O., & Azeez, A. L. (2020). Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review. Heliyon, 6(11), e05312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312
Abuhassna, H., Adnan, M. A. B. M., & Awae, F. (2024). Exploring the synergy between instructional design models and learning theories: A systematic literature review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(2), Article ep499. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14289
Heinonen, N., Katajavuori, N., Murtonen, M., & Södervik, I. (2023). Short pedagogical training in supporting university teachers’ professional vision: A comparison of prospective and current faculty teachers. Instructional Science, 51(2), 201–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09603-7
Hidayati, D., & Slamet, J. (2025). Interactive multimedia via LMS on a reading comprehension course: Enhancing engagement and learning outcomes in Islamic higher education. Journal of Studies in the English Language, 20(1), 95–122. https://doi.org/10.64731/jsel.v20i1.277426
Jaramillo-Mediavilla, L., Basantes-Andrade, A., Cabezas-González, M., & Casillas-Martín, S. (2024). Impact of gamification on motivation and academic performance: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 14(6), Article 639. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060639
Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer.
Manurung, S. R. (2020). Improving students’ thinking ability in physics using interactive multimedia based problem solving. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(2), 460–470.
Mayer, R. E. (2024). The past, present, and future of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1
Morris, D. L. (2025). Rethinking science education practices: Shifting from investigation-centric to comprehensive inquiry-based instruction. Education Sciences, 15(1), Article 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010073
Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Harris, N. R., Sanders, T., Parker, P., del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2022). Multimedia design for learning: An overview of reviews with meta-meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 92(3), 413–454. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211052329
Pang, S., Lv, G., Zhang, Y., & Yang, Y. (2025). Enhancing students’ science learning using virtual simulation technologies: A systematic review. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 45(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2441676
Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
Rathnasekara, K., Yatigammana, K., & Suraweera, N. (2025). Innovative pedagogical framework in K–12 education: Enhancing productivity and engagement of digital natives within resource-constrained environments. Quality Education for All, 2(1), 415–440. https://doi.org/10.1108/QEA-11-2024-0129
Sortwell, A., Gkintoni, E., Díaz-García, J., Ellerton, P., Ferraz, R., & Hine, G. (2026). Beyond cognitive load theory: Why learning needs more than memory management. Brain Sciences, 16(1), Article 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16010109
Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 1–16.
Thompson Burdine, J., Thorne, S., & Sandhu, G. (2021). Interpretive description: A flexible qualitative methodology for medical education research. Medical Education, 55(3), 336–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14380
Veda, O. X., & Pamungkas, R. R. (2024). The effectiveness of interactive multimedia in learning: A rapid literature review (2018–2024). Journal of Academic Media, 3(5).
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wen, C.-T., Liu, C.-C., Chang, H.-Y., Chang, C.-J., Chang, M.-H., Fan Chiang, S.-H., Yang, C.-W., & Hwang, F.-K. (2020). Students’ guided inquiry with simulation and its relation to school science achievement and scientific literacy. Computers & Education, 149, Article 103830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103830
Yong, P., & Peng, Y. (2025). Strategies for enhancing the scholarship of teaching and learning among primary and secondary school teachers: A grounded theory analysis. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1542528. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1542528
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ibermarza Ibermarza, Yurnalisma Dewi, Fitria Carli Wiseza, Ayu Wandari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
