Evaluating Learning Community Programs for Teacher Professionalism Using the Cipp Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61255/jupiter.v4i2.1015Keywords:
Learning Community, Teacher Professionalism, CIPP Evaluation Model, Disruption Era, Quality of LearningAbstract
n the era of disruption and the 4.0 industrial revolution, educators should think about the balance of hard skills and soft skills to avoid boring and demagogic learning processes, which might decrease human dignity. This research is aimed at in-depth evaluation of the efficiency of the "JERMAN GC" Learning Community (Kombel) at SMP Islam PB. Soedirman Bekasi as a platform for the transformation of the potential professionalism of teachers. The evaluation was conducted utilising the CIPP model (Context, Input, Process, Product) with a descriptive qualitative method. Data collection was done by observation, in-depth interviews, and document studies. Data analysis was done by using Miles and Huberman's interactive model. The research findings indicate that in terms of context, this program is very relevant to the teachers’ desires for a reflective collaborative space. On the input side, the existence of internal resource persons and comprehensive training materials provide a good basis. In terms of procedure, there is a steady managerial cycle of planning, implementation and successful peer coaching. In terms of product, the program was successful in improving teachers’ pedagogical competence, improving the quality of 4C-based learning (critical, creative, collaborative, communicative), and was considered to be very cost-effective. The outcome of this research is that Kombel “JERMAN GC” has successfully become the driving force for the reform of the learning culture in schools. This research has consequences, to the fact that community-based teacher professionalism development with minimum costs can have maximum impact on the quality of education, thus this approach is highly replicable by other educational institutions in developing an adaptive and innovative school ecosystem.
Abstract views: 0
,
PDF downloads: 0
Downloads
References
Agustina, A. E., Riswandi, R., & Sari, S. R. (2025). Systematic Literature Review: Teacher Learning Communities as a Strategy for Sustainable Professional Development in Schools. Ensiklopedia: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Saburai, 5(01). https://doi.org/10.24967/esp.v5i01.4365
Apriliyani, S., Nuryaman, H., Arif Nurrahmat, J., Sahrodi, J., & Iwan. (2025). The Essence of Humanity and the Philosophy of Islamic Education. International Journal on Higher Education Issues, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.59966/ckkd3b76
BPK, S. W. J. (2024). UU No 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Indonesia. DataBase Peraturan, 20.
Christiana, E. (2013). Pendidikan yang Memanusiakan Manusia. Humaniora, 4(1), 398. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v4i1.3450
Fauzan, R., & Miyono, N. (2024). Peran Guru Dalam Komunikasi Efektif Melalui Komunitas Belajar. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 09(04).
Li, S., Wen, Z., Zhu, L., Li, J., Zhu, H., Zhu, B., & Zu, H. (2024). The Influence of Learning Team on User Creativity in Online Learning Community. SAGE Open, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241305594
Munianti, S. (2022). Pentingnya Pengembangan Kompetensi Guru Di Era Digital. JSG: Jurnal Sang Guru, 1(3).
Nurdin, L., Alim, J. A., Hermita, N., Marhadi, H., & Putra, Z. H. (2025). Peran Komunitas Belajar dalam Meningkatkan Profesionalisme dan Kualitas Pembelajaran Guru. Jurnal Kiprah Pendidikan, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.33578/kpd.v4i3.p335-340
Priyono, A., & Arief, A. (2022). Profesionalisme Guru Di Era Teknologi Disrupsi. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Guru (JIPG), 3(2). https://doi.org/10.30738/jipg.vol3.no2.a12712
Qin, X. (2024). The Nature of Human and the Position of Human Education. Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 6(12). https://doi.org/10.53469/jssh.2024.6(12).13
Sekar, R. Y., & Kamarubiani, N. (2023). KOMUNITAS BELAJAR SEBAGAI SARANA BELAJAR DAN PENGEMBANGAN DIRI. Indonesian Journal of Adult and Community Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/ijace.v2i1.28285
Setyasari, G. E., Sutopo, A., & Fuadi, D. (2025). Pengelolaan Komunitas Belajar Guru: Tantangan dan Peluang dalam Peningkatan Profesionalisme. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 14(2 Mei).
Sinaga, W. M. B. B., & Firmansyah, A. (2024). Perubahan Paradigma Pendidikan di Era Digital. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 1(4), 10. https://doi.org/10.47134/jtp.v1i4.492
Stevens, N. (2024). Thinking of Learning Communities? Here Are Some of the Ways They May Benefit Your Medical Students. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 11. https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205231223303
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2019). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. Jossey-Bass. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 11, Issue 1).
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2019). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications, 2nd Edition. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 11, Issue 1).
Suryani, M. (2024). Hakekat Pendidikan dalam Kehidupan Manusia. Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 3(03). https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v3i03.3397
Tichenor, M. S., & Heins, E. (2000). Study Groups: An Inquiry-Based Approach to Improving Schools. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 73(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650009599434
Zhang, J. (2020). The Construction of College English Online Learning Community under ADDIE Model. English Language Teaching, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n7p46
Καραλής, Θ. (2025). Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models, & Applications. Hellenic Evaluation Society Review, 1. https://doi.org/10.12681/eea.40213port and collaboration. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i2.331
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ibnu Muthi, Imam Suseno

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






