Integration of the STEM Approach in Indonesian Language Learning to Improve Elementary School Students’ Critical Thinking Skills: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Authors

  • Dwi Rohman Soleh Universitas PGRI Madiun
  • Addy Septyawan Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Estuning Dewi Hapsari Universitas PGRI Madiun

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61255/jupiter.v4i3.1271

Keywords:

Critical Thinking Skills, Elementary School Students, Indonesian Language Learning, Quasi-Experimental Study, STEM Approach

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine whether incorporating the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) method into Indonesian language instruction may enhance elementary school students' critical thinking abilities. The study was carried out in response to students' poor critical thinking abilities and the underutilisation of interdisciplinary teaching methods in Indonesian language instruction. Methods: This study used a nonequivalent control group design and a quasi-experimental method in a quantitative manner. 55 primary school kids made up the participants; they were split into two groups: an experimental class (n = 28) and a control class (n = 27). Pretests and posttests of critical thinking skills, classroom observations, and documentation were used to gather data. Descriptive statistics, homogeneity and normality tests, paired-sample t-tests, and independent-sample t-tests were all used in the data analysis. Findings: The findings showed that students' critical thinking abilities were much enhanced by the use of the STEM methodology. While the independent-sample t-test revealed significantly higher posttest scores in the experimental group relative to the control group (p < 0.05), the paired-sample t-test revealed a significant difference between pretest and posttest scores in the experimental class (p < 0.05). The STEM intervention had a significant educational influence on students' critical thinking abilities, according to the computed effect size. Research implications: Because of the study's single-school context, limited sample size, and lack of random assignment, the results should be interpreted cautiously even though they show the efficacy of STEM-based Indonesian language acquisition. To improve the findings' generalisability, larger and more varied sample sizes from various educational environments should be used in future research. Originality: By incorporating the STEM approach into Indonesian language learning an area that has gotten little attention in prior research this study makes a unique addition. This study shows how STEM integration in language instruction can improve students' critical thinking abilities, in contrast to the majority of STEM studies that concentrate on science and maths.

Abstract views: 13 , PDF downloads: 8

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amin, M., Rahmawati, Y., Sudrajat, A., & Mardiah, A. (2022). Enhancing Primary School Students’ Critical Thinking Skills through the Integration of Inquiry-Based STEM Approach on Teaching Electricity in Science Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2377(1), 012090. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2377/1/012090

Andrade, C. (2021). The Limitations of Quasi-Experimental Studies, and Methods for Data Analysis When a Quasi-Experimental Research Design Is Unavoidable. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 43(5), 451–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176211034707

Chen, L., Taniguchi, Y., Shimada, A., & Yamada, M. (2024). Exploring Behavioral and Strategic Factors Affecting Secondary Students’ Learning Performance in Collaborative Problem Solving-Based STEM Lessons. Sage Open, 14(2), 21582440241251641. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241251641

Demircioglu, T., Karakus, M., & Ucar, S. (2023). Developing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills and Argumentation Abilities Through Augmented Reality–Based Argumentation Activities in Science Classes. Science & Education, 32(4), 1165–1195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00369-5

Dilekçi, A., & Karatay, H. (2023). The effects of the 21st century skills curriculum on the development of students’ creative thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 101229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101229

English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1

Falloon, G., Hatzigianni, M., Bower, M., Forbes, A., & Stevenson, M. (2020). Understanding K-12 STEM Education: A Framework for Developing STEM Literacy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(3), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09823-x

Fernández-Santín, M., & Feliu-Torruella, M. (2020). Developing critical thinking in early childhood through the philosophy of Reggio Emilia. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100686

Graesser, A. C., Greiff, S., Stadler, M., & Shubeck, K. T. (2020). Collaboration in the 21st century: The theory, assessment, and teaching of collaborative problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.010

Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): A framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203772

Hidayat, A., Maharani, S., Pratama, D., Ramadiani, R., Sujito, S., Septyawan, A., & Sjuchro, D. W. (2026). Predicting Student Academic Success Using Machine Learning Models: A Learning Analytics Approach in Higher Education. Daengku: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Innovation, 6(1), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.daengku4881

Hidayat, R., Nugroho, I., Zainuddin, Z., & Ingai, T. A. (2023). A systematic review of analytical thinking skills in STEM education settings. Information and Learning Sciences, 125(7–8), 565–586. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-06-2023-0070

Hitchcock, D. (2017). Critical Thinking as an Educational Ideal. In D. Hitchcock (Ed.), On Reasoning and Argument: Essays in Informal Logic and on Critical Thinking (pp. 477–497). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53562-3_30

Huang, P. (2019). Textbook interaction: A study of the language and cultural contextualisation of English learning textbooks. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.02.006

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

Kidman, G., & Tan, H. (2025). Disciplinary Thinking in STEM: Balancing Epistemologies for Integrated Education. In G. Kidman, H. Tan, R. Gesthuizen, & D. D. Mangao (Eds.), Knowledge Generation in STEM and STEAM Education: Integrative Thinking and Agency (pp. 29–60). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-03247-8_2

Leung, A. (2019). Exploring STEM Pedagogy in the Mathematics Classroom: A Tool-Based Experiment Lesson on Estimation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(7), 1339–1358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9924-9

Maharani, S., Yuniahastuti, I. T., Susanti, V. D., Prastyaningrum, I., & Septyawan, A. (2026). A Computational Thinking Learning Trajectory for Primary Mathematics through Renewable Energy Optimization Projects. Daengku: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Innovation, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.daengku5023

Marbach-Ad, G., Hunt, C., & Thompson, K. V. (2019). Exploring the Values Undergraduate Students Attribute to Cross-disciplinary Skills Needed for the Workplace: An Analysis of Five STEM Disciplines. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(5), 452–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09778-8

Micari, M., & Pazos, P. (2021). Beyond grades: Improving college students’ social-cognitive outcomes in STEM through a collaborative learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 24(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09325-y

Newman, M., & Gough, D. (2020). Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application. In O. Zawacki-Richter, M. Kerres, S. Bedenlier, M. Bond, & K. Buntins (Eds.), Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application (pp. 3–22). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7_1

Okolie, U. C., Igwe, P. A., Mong, I. K., Nwosu, H. E., Kanu, C., & Ojemuyide, C. C. (2022). Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills through engagement with innovative pedagogical practices in Global South. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(4), 1184–1198. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1896482

Polman, J., Hornstra, L., & Volman, M. (2021). The meaning of meaningful learning in mathematics in upper-primary education. Learning Environments Research, 24(3), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09337-8

Power, D. J., Cyphert, D., & Roth, R. M. (2019). Analytics, bias, and evidence: The quest for rational decision making. Journal of Decision Systems, 28(2), 120–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2019.1623534

Ragab, K., Fernandez-Ahumada, E., & Martínez-Jiménez, E. (2024). Engaging Minds—Unlocking Potential with Interactive Technology in Enhancing Students’ Engagement in STEM Education. In A. ElSayary & R. Olowoselu (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Approaches for Educators’ and Learners’ Well-being: Transforming Education for Sustainable Development (pp. 53–66). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65215-8_5

Retno, R. S., Purnomo, P., Hidayat, A., & Mashfufah, A. (2025). Conceptual framework design for STEM-integrated project-based learning (PjBL-STEM) for elementary schools. Asian Education and Development Studies, 14(3), 579–604. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-08-2024-0188

Reynders, G., Lantz, J., Ruder, S. M., Stanford, C. L., & Cole, R. S. (2020). Rubrics to assess critical thinking and information processing in undergraduate STEM courses. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00208-5

Rizki, I. A., & Suprapto, N. (2024). Project-Oriented Problem-Based Learning Through SR-STEM to Foster Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Renewable Energy Material. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33(4), 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10102-2

Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Ring-Whalen, E. (2021). Beyond the basics: A detailed conceptual framework of integrated STEM. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00041-y

Sarwi, S., Baihaqi, M. A., & Ellianawati, E. (2021). Implementation of Project Based Learning Based on STEM Approach to Improve Students’ Problems Solving Abilities. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(5), 052049. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/5/052049

Strauss, D. (2016). How critical is “critical thinking”? South African Journal of Philosophy, 35(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2016.1191853

Struyf, A., De Loof, H., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Students’ engagement in different STEM learning environments: Integrated STEM education as promising practice? International Journal of Science Education, 41(10), 1387–1407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1607983

Sumarni, W., Supardi, K. I., & Widiarti, N. (2018). Development of assessment instruments to measure critical thinking skills. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 349(1), 012066. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/349/1/012066

Sun, W., & Zhong, B. (2024). Integrating reading and writing with STEAM/STEM: A systematic review on STREAM education. Journal of Engineering Education, 113(4), 939–958. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20569

Taimur, S., & Sattar, H. (2020). Education for Sustainable Development and Critical Thinking Competency. In Quality Education (pp. 238–248). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95870-5_64

Tan, A.-L., Ong, Y. S., Ng, Y. S., & Tan, J. H. J. (2023). STEM Problem Solving: Inquiry, Concepts, and Reasoning. Science & Education, 32(2), 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00310-2

Tan, H., & Kidman, G. (2025). Twenty-First Century Skills and STEMSTEM Education: A Review of Literature. In G. Kidman, H. Tan, R. Gesthuizen, & D. D. Mangao (Eds.), Knowledge Generation in STEM and STEAM Education: Integrative Thinking and Agency (pp. 127–173). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-03247-8_5

Tytler, R. (2020). STEM Education for the Twenty-First Century. In J. Anderson & Y. Li (Eds.), Integrated Approaches to STEM Education: An International Perspective (pp. 21–43). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_3

Utami, A., Rochintaniawati, D., & Suwarma, I. R. (2020). Enhancement of STEM literacy on knowledge aspect after implementing science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM)-based instructional module. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(4), 042048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042048

Zawacki-Richter, O., Kerres, M., Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., & Buntins, K. (Eds.). (2020). Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7

Downloads

Published

2026-07-07

How to Cite

Soleh, D. R., Septyawan, A., & Hapsari, E. D. (2026). Integration of the STEM Approach in Indonesian Language Learning to Improve Elementary School Students’ Critical Thinking Skills: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Jurnal Pendidikan Terapan, 4(3), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.61255/jupiter.v4i3.1271

Issue

Section

Articles