Integration of the STEM Approach in Indonesian Language Learning to Improve Elementary School Students’ Critical Thinking Skills: A Quasi-Experimental Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61255/jupiter.v4i3.1271Keywords:
Critical Thinking Skills, Elementary School Students, Indonesian Language Learning, Quasi-Experimental Study, STEM ApproachAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine whether incorporating the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) method into Indonesian language instruction may enhance elementary school students' critical thinking abilities. The study was carried out in response to students' poor critical thinking abilities and the underutilisation of interdisciplinary teaching methods in Indonesian language instruction. Methods: This study used a nonequivalent control group design and a quasi-experimental method in a quantitative manner. 55 primary school kids made up the participants; they were split into two groups: an experimental class (n = 28) and a control class (n = 27). Pretests and posttests of critical thinking skills, classroom observations, and documentation were used to gather data. Descriptive statistics, homogeneity and normality tests, paired-sample t-tests, and independent-sample t-tests were all used in the data analysis. Findings: The findings showed that students' critical thinking abilities were much enhanced by the use of the STEM methodology. While the independent-sample t-test revealed significantly higher posttest scores in the experimental group relative to the control group (p < 0.05), the paired-sample t-test revealed a significant difference between pretest and posttest scores in the experimental class (p < 0.05). The STEM intervention had a significant educational influence on students' critical thinking abilities, according to the computed effect size. Research implications: Because of the study's single-school context, limited sample size, and lack of random assignment, the results should be interpreted cautiously even though they show the efficacy of STEM-based Indonesian language acquisition. To improve the findings' generalisability, larger and more varied sample sizes from various educational environments should be used in future research. Originality: By incorporating the STEM approach into Indonesian language learning an area that has gotten little attention in prior research this study makes a unique addition. This study shows how STEM integration in language instruction can improve students' critical thinking abilities, in contrast to the majority of STEM studies that concentrate on science and maths.
Abstract views: 13
,
PDF downloads: 8
Downloads
References
Amin, M., Rahmawati, Y., Sudrajat, A., & Mardiah, A. (2022). Enhancing Primary School Students’ Critical Thinking Skills through the Integration of Inquiry-Based STEM Approach on Teaching Electricity in Science Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2377(1), 012090. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2377/1/012090
Andrade, C. (2021). The Limitations of Quasi-Experimental Studies, and Methods for Data Analysis When a Quasi-Experimental Research Design Is Unavoidable. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 43(5), 451–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176211034707
Chen, L., Taniguchi, Y., Shimada, A., & Yamada, M. (2024). Exploring Behavioral and Strategic Factors Affecting Secondary Students’ Learning Performance in Collaborative Problem Solving-Based STEM Lessons. Sage Open, 14(2), 21582440241251641. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241251641
Demircioglu, T., Karakus, M., & Ucar, S. (2023). Developing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills and Argumentation Abilities Through Augmented Reality–Based Argumentation Activities in Science Classes. Science & Education, 32(4), 1165–1195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00369-5
Dilekçi, A., & Karatay, H. (2023). The effects of the 21st century skills curriculum on the development of students’ creative thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 101229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101229
English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1
Falloon, G., Hatzigianni, M., Bower, M., Forbes, A., & Stevenson, M. (2020). Understanding K-12 STEM Education: A Framework for Developing STEM Literacy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(3), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09823-x
Fernández-Santín, M., & Feliu-Torruella, M. (2020). Developing critical thinking in early childhood through the philosophy of Reggio Emilia. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100686
Graesser, A. C., Greiff, S., Stadler, M., & Shubeck, K. T. (2020). Collaboration in the 21st century: The theory, assessment, and teaching of collaborative problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.010
Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): A framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203772
Hidayat, A., Maharani, S., Pratama, D., Ramadiani, R., Sujito, S., Septyawan, A., & Sjuchro, D. W. (2026). Predicting Student Academic Success Using Machine Learning Models: A Learning Analytics Approach in Higher Education. Daengku: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Innovation, 6(1), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.daengku4881
Hidayat, R., Nugroho, I., Zainuddin, Z., & Ingai, T. A. (2023). A systematic review of analytical thinking skills in STEM education settings. Information and Learning Sciences, 125(7–8), 565–586. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-06-2023-0070
Hitchcock, D. (2017). Critical Thinking as an Educational Ideal. In D. Hitchcock (Ed.), On Reasoning and Argument: Essays in Informal Logic and on Critical Thinking (pp. 477–497). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53562-3_30
Huang, P. (2019). Textbook interaction: A study of the language and cultural contextualisation of English learning textbooks. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.02.006
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Kidman, G., & Tan, H. (2025). Disciplinary Thinking in STEM: Balancing Epistemologies for Integrated Education. In G. Kidman, H. Tan, R. Gesthuizen, & D. D. Mangao (Eds.), Knowledge Generation in STEM and STEAM Education: Integrative Thinking and Agency (pp. 29–60). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-03247-8_2
Leung, A. (2019). Exploring STEM Pedagogy in the Mathematics Classroom: A Tool-Based Experiment Lesson on Estimation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(7), 1339–1358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9924-9
Maharani, S., Yuniahastuti, I. T., Susanti, V. D., Prastyaningrum, I., & Septyawan, A. (2026). A Computational Thinking Learning Trajectory for Primary Mathematics through Renewable Energy Optimization Projects. Daengku: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Innovation, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.daengku5023
Marbach-Ad, G., Hunt, C., & Thompson, K. V. (2019). Exploring the Values Undergraduate Students Attribute to Cross-disciplinary Skills Needed for the Workplace: An Analysis of Five STEM Disciplines. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(5), 452–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09778-8
Micari, M., & Pazos, P. (2021). Beyond grades: Improving college students’ social-cognitive outcomes in STEM through a collaborative learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 24(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09325-y
Newman, M., & Gough, D. (2020). Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application. In O. Zawacki-Richter, M. Kerres, S. Bedenlier, M. Bond, & K. Buntins (Eds.), Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application (pp. 3–22). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7_1
Okolie, U. C., Igwe, P. A., Mong, I. K., Nwosu, H. E., Kanu, C., & Ojemuyide, C. C. (2022). Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills through engagement with innovative pedagogical practices in Global South. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(4), 1184–1198. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1896482
Polman, J., Hornstra, L., & Volman, M. (2021). The meaning of meaningful learning in mathematics in upper-primary education. Learning Environments Research, 24(3), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09337-8
Power, D. J., Cyphert, D., & Roth, R. M. (2019). Analytics, bias, and evidence: The quest for rational decision making. Journal of Decision Systems, 28(2), 120–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2019.1623534
Ragab, K., Fernandez-Ahumada, E., & Martínez-Jiménez, E. (2024). Engaging Minds—Unlocking Potential with Interactive Technology in Enhancing Students’ Engagement in STEM Education. In A. ElSayary & R. Olowoselu (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Approaches for Educators’ and Learners’ Well-being: Transforming Education for Sustainable Development (pp. 53–66). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65215-8_5
Retno, R. S., Purnomo, P., Hidayat, A., & Mashfufah, A. (2025). Conceptual framework design for STEM-integrated project-based learning (PjBL-STEM) for elementary schools. Asian Education and Development Studies, 14(3), 579–604. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-08-2024-0188
Reynders, G., Lantz, J., Ruder, S. M., Stanford, C. L., & Cole, R. S. (2020). Rubrics to assess critical thinking and information processing in undergraduate STEM courses. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00208-5
Rizki, I. A., & Suprapto, N. (2024). Project-Oriented Problem-Based Learning Through SR-STEM to Foster Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Renewable Energy Material. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33(4), 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10102-2
Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Ring-Whalen, E. (2021). Beyond the basics: A detailed conceptual framework of integrated STEM. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00041-y
Sarwi, S., Baihaqi, M. A., & Ellianawati, E. (2021). Implementation of Project Based Learning Based on STEM Approach to Improve Students’ Problems Solving Abilities. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(5), 052049. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/5/052049
Strauss, D. (2016). How critical is “critical thinking”? South African Journal of Philosophy, 35(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2016.1191853
Struyf, A., De Loof, H., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Students’ engagement in different STEM learning environments: Integrated STEM education as promising practice? International Journal of Science Education, 41(10), 1387–1407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1607983
Sumarni, W., Supardi, K. I., & Widiarti, N. (2018). Development of assessment instruments to measure critical thinking skills. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 349(1), 012066. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/349/1/012066
Sun, W., & Zhong, B. (2024). Integrating reading and writing with STEAM/STEM: A systematic review on STREAM education. Journal of Engineering Education, 113(4), 939–958. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20569
Taimur, S., & Sattar, H. (2020). Education for Sustainable Development and Critical Thinking Competency. In Quality Education (pp. 238–248). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95870-5_64
Tan, A.-L., Ong, Y. S., Ng, Y. S., & Tan, J. H. J. (2023). STEM Problem Solving: Inquiry, Concepts, and Reasoning. Science & Education, 32(2), 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00310-2
Tan, H., & Kidman, G. (2025). Twenty-First Century Skills and STEMSTEM Education: A Review of Literature. In G. Kidman, H. Tan, R. Gesthuizen, & D. D. Mangao (Eds.), Knowledge Generation in STEM and STEAM Education: Integrative Thinking and Agency (pp. 127–173). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-03247-8_5
Tytler, R. (2020). STEM Education for the Twenty-First Century. In J. Anderson & Y. Li (Eds.), Integrated Approaches to STEM Education: An International Perspective (pp. 21–43). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_3
Utami, A., Rochintaniawati, D., & Suwarma, I. R. (2020). Enhancement of STEM literacy on knowledge aspect after implementing science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM)-based instructional module. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(4), 042048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042048
Zawacki-Richter, O., Kerres, M., Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., & Buntins, K. (Eds.). (2020). Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dwi Rohman Soleh, Addy Septyawan, Estuning Dewi Hapsari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






