The Use of Educational Robots and Pedagogical Deep Learning Approach to Enhance Critical Thinking in Early Childhood Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61255/jupiter.v4i4.1399Keywords:
Critical Thinking, Deep Learning, Early Chilhood Education, Educational Robotics, STEM LearningAbstract
Purpose: This study aims to examine the implementation of Educational Robots using a Pedagogical Deep Learning Approach as a learning medium to foster critical thinking skills in early childhood education. Methods: This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach. Data were collected through observations and semi-structured interviews involving children aged 5–6 years. The data were analyzed using coding, category development, and thematic analysis to identify patterns and themes emerging from the learning process. Findings: The findings indicate that Educational Robots were implemented through learning activities emphasizing exploration, problem-solving, and collaborative play, in line with the principles of meaningful, mindful, and joyful learning. The results suggest that the use of Educational Robots facilitated children's critical thinking skills, as reflected in their ability to analyze shapes, make decisions, predict outcomes, identify errors, and revise construction strategies. In addition, increased engagement, collaboration, and curiosity were observed throughout the learning process. Research Implications: This study suggests that Educational Robots integrated with a Pedagogical Deep Learning Approach can facilitate meaningful and accessible learning experiences that support the development of critical thinking skills in early childhood. The findings also offer an innovative, affordable, and sustainable learning medium that can assist early childhood educators in implementing meaningful learning practices. Originality: The originality of this study lies in integrating Educational Robots constructed from recycled materials with a Pedagogical Deep Learning Approach to foster critical thinking skills in early childhood education. This study offers an innovative, affordable, sustainable, and contextually relevant learning medium to support the implementation of meaningful learning in Indonesian early childhood education settings.
Abstract views: 44
,
PDF downloads: 49
Downloads
References
Aryani, N., Herwina, H., Safitri, L., & Maharani, D. F. (2023). Pelatihan merancang modul P5 untuk guru taman kanak-kanak. Martabe: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 6(6), 1959–1965. https://doi.org/10.31604/jpm.v6i6.1959-1965
Aryani, N., Mudjiran, & Rakimahwati. (2020). Manajemen Pembelajaran PAUD Berbasis Perkembangan Anak (1st ed.). Edu Publisher. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=SlDwDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=id&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Aryani, N., Rizka, N., Suparmi, Artamevia, F., & Nazli, N. L. M. (2024). Higher order thinking skill ( HOTS ) through STEAM learning for early childhood. JPUD - Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini, 18(2), 308–314. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpud.v18i2.48422
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.sagepub.com/shop/buy-a-book/qualitative-inquiry-and-research-design-4-246896
Ding, Y., & Li, Y. (2024). A study of preschool integration of deep learning to optimize the content of personalized education for young children. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-2432
Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2018). Deep Learning: Engage the World, Change the World. Corwin. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506368603
Gao, Y., Wong, S. L., Khambari, M. N. M., & Noordin, N. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of online faculty professional development in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17(17). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-00196-w
Helena, E. S., Rantung, D. A., & Naibaho, L. (2023). Pemanfaatan teknologi bergerak sebagai strategi pembelajaran pendidikan agama Kristen pada anak usia dini. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(2), 1124–1132. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v6i2.1591
Hermita, N., Alim, J. A., Putra, Z. H., Putra, R. A., Anggoro, S., & Aryani, N. (2023). The effect of STEM autonomous learning city map application on students’ critical thinking skills. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 17(3), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i03.34587
Kumala, R. A. D., Fathiyah, K. N., & Krisnani, R. V. R. (2023). Computational thinking pada anak usia dini : tinjauan sistematis. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(3), 3418–3436. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i3.4520
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Liu, X., & Pange, J. (2015). Early childhood teachers ’ perceived barriers to ICT integration in teaching : a survey study in Mainland China. Journal of Computers in Education, 2, 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-014-0025-7
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. https://www.wiley.com/en-se/shop/general-introductory-education/qualitative-research-a-guide-to-design-and-implementation-4th-edition-p-9781119003601
Merry, I. M., Prabawa, M. R. D., Philip, K., Limbong, P. A., Nugraha, I. P. E. D., & Setiawan, W. (2024). Perancangan robot mainan pintar berbasis sensor dan teknologi machine learning. Majalah Ilmiah Teknologi Elektro, 23(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.24843/mite.2024.v23i01.p09
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis : A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us2.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-data-analysis/book246128
Misirli, A., & Komis, V. (2023). Computational thinking in early childhood education: The impact of programming a tangible robot on developing debugging knowledge. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 65, 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.05.014
Mursyidah, N. H., & Mardiana, E. A. P. (2023). Pengaruh permainan edukasi untuk meningkatkan computational thinking anak usia 5–6 tahun menuju Society 5.0. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kemahasiswaan, 1(1), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.56983/prosidingkemahasiswaan.v1i1.1448
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2020). Developmentally Appropriate Practice: A Position Statement of the National Association for the Education of Young Children. NAEYC. https://www.naeyc.org/resources/position-statements/dap/contents
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematics and Financial Literacy. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264255425-en
Park, H. J., Byun, S. Y., Sim, J., Han, H., & Baek, Y. S. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions and practices of STEAM education in South Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7), 1739–1753. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1531a
Park, S. D., Kim, E. J., & Kim, K. C. (2019). A meta-analysis on the effects of learning with robots in early childhood education in Korea. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 11(3), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2019070104
Ruangtip, P., Ruckbumrung, T., & Rueboon, W. (2025). Enhancing computational thinking in elementary students through STEM and Mojobot. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 14(5), 3917–3927. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i5.33091
Spradley, J. P. (2016). Participant Observation. Waveland Press. https://www.waveland.com/browse.php?t=689
Su, J., Ng, D. T. K., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in early childhood education: Challenges and opportunities. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100124
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, R&D dan Penelitian Pendidikan. Alfabeta. https://eprints.binadarma.ac.id/opac/detail/6897
Tariq, R., Babines, B. M. A., Ramirez, J., Alvarez-Icaza, I., & Naseer, F (2025). Computational thinking in STEM education: Current state-of-the-art and future research directions. Frontiers in Computer Science, 6, 1480404. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2024.1480404
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. Jossey-Bass. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/shop/general-introductory-education/21st-century-skills-learning-for-life-in-our-times-p-9780470553916
Williams, R., Park, H. W., Oh, L., & Breazeal, C. (2019). Popbots: Designing an artificial intelligence curriculum for early childhood education. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33(01), 9729–9736. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019729
Winter, J. C. F. De, Dodou, D., Moorlag, F., & Broekens, J. (2026). Social robots : a meta-analysis of learning outcomes. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 12, 1735198, DOI 10.3389/frobt.2025.1735198
Zhao, Y., Gao, W., & Ku, S. (2023). Optimization of the game improvement and data analysis model for the early childhood education major via deep learning. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 20273. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46060-9
Zviel-Girshin, R., & Rosenberg, N. (2021). How to enhance creativity and inquiry-based science education in early childhood: Robotic Moon Settlement Project. Creative Education, 12(11), 2485–2504. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2021.1211186
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nini Aryani, Nelti Rizka, Fikri Ramadan, Tommy Tanu Wijaya , Priska Novita

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
