Evaluation of the Learning Quality of the Agricultural Industrial Technology Study Program Using Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) And Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61255/jupiter.v4i3.1441

Keywords:

Learning Quality, Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI), Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA), Agricultural Industrial Technology

Abstract

Purpose: This study analyzes the learning process quality in the Agricultural Industrial Technology Program at Universitas Negeri Makassar by evaluating satisfaction, analyzing gaps, and mapping priority attributes to provide data-driven management recommendations. Methods: This descriptive quantitative survey involved 121 active students, split into pilot and main groups. Content validity was verified using Aiken’s V with 5 experts. Construct validity was tested via Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in JASP, and reliability via Cronbach's Alpha. Data analysis integrated the Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) and Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA). Findings: Aiken's V confirmed content validity (V ≥ 0.87). CFA eliminated 5 weak items, leaving 40 valid items with excellent reliability (alpha = 0.958). Indicator CSI scores reflected "Satisfied" and "Very Satisfied" categories (70.08%–84.40%). The grand mean of performance (X = 3.99) fell below importance (Y = 4.46), yielding a -0.47 gap. The IPA matrix identified two critical Quadrant I (Top Priority) attributes: lab staff responsiveness to technical glitches (Item 18) and flexible personal tutoring for struggling students (Item 34). Research Implications: These findings direct study program management to bypass high-cost overhauls, reallocating those resources to optimize laboratory staff responsiveness and more personalized student mentoring. Additionally, the CSI baseline indicates that student satisfaction remains anchored by strong pedagogy, proving that interventions must target specific technical and administrative bottlenecks. Originality: This study hybridizes the SERVQUAL framework with the latest National Higher Education Standards (Permendiktisaintek No. 39/2025), statistically reinforced by CFA to map academic dynamics in a developing engineering program.
Abstract views: 28 , PDF downloads: 12

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Amanah, N., Mujahidin, E., & Andriana, N. (2022). Analysis of Curriculum Planning by Using Importance Performance Analysis Technique. Al-Idarah : Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 12(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.24042/alidarah.v12i2.13529

Aslamiyah, S. (2023). Implementation of the Kano Model and Importance and Performance Analysis in the Development of a Web-Based Knowledge Management System. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Research, 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.55537/JISTR.V2I1.552

Azwar, S. (2021). Dasar-dasar Psikometrika (Edisi II). Pustaka Pelajar.

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (11.0 update). In A Simple Guide and Reference (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

Goss-Sampson, M. (2019). Statistical analysis in JASP: a guide for students. JASP. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.9980744

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (Eighth Edition). Annabel Ainscow. www.cengage.com/highered

Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining Quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180102

Hendryadi, H. (2017). Validitas Isi: Tahap Awal Pengembangan Kuesioner. Jurnal Riset Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 2(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.36226/JRMB.V2I2.47

Hill, Y., Lomas, L., & Macgregor, J. (2003). Students’ perceptions of quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880310462047

Juran, J. M. (1998). Juran’s quality handbook, Fifth Edition. McGraw-Hill.

Latifah, L., Herlambang, A. D., & Wijoyo, S. H. (2021). Mastery of Technological Pedagogical And Content Knowledge (TPACK) Prospective Teacher In ICT Expertise Brawijaya University. Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 6(3), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.25126/JITECS.202163350

Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. V. (2006). Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review. ACM Computing Surveys, 38(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/1132960.1132961

Maidiana, M. (2021). Penelitian Survey. Alacrity Journal of Education, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.52121/alacrity.v1i2.23

Mardapi, D. (2017). Pengukuran, penilaian dan evaluasi pendidikan. Parama Publishing.

Miranda, F. J., Chamorro, A., Murillo, L. R., & Vega, J. (2010). An Importance-Performance Analysis of Primary Health Care Services: Managers vs. Patients Perceptions. Journal of Service Science and Management, 3(2), 227–234. https://doi.org/10.4236/JSSM.2010.32028

Mujahidin, E., Syamsuddin, Nurhayati, I., Hafidhuddin, D., Bahruddin, E., & Endri, E. (2021). Importance Performance Analysis Model for Implementation in National Education Standards (SNPs). Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(5), 114. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0127

Nazari-Shirkouhi, S., Mousakhani, S., Tavakoli, M., Dalvand, M. R., Šaparauskas, J., & Antuchevičienė, J. (2020). Importance-performance analysis based balanced scorecard for performance evaluation in higher education institutions: an integrated fuzzy approach. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(3), 647–678. https://doi.org/10.3846/JBEM.2020.11940

O’Neill, M. A., & Palmer, A. (2004). Importance-performance analysis: a useful tool for directing continuous quality improvement in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 12(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880410517423

Parahoo, S. K., Santally, M. I., Rajabalee, Y., & Harvey, H. L. (2016). Designing a predictive model of student satisfaction in online learning. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 26(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2015.1083511

Parasuraman, A. ;, Zeithaml, V. A. ;, & Berry, L. L. (1988). Servqual: A Multiple-Item Scale For Measuring Consumer Perc. Journal of Retailing; Spring, 64.

Patahuddin, P., Sappaile, B. I., Ishak, S., Hamidah, N. F., & Nur Alim, U. (2025). Menguji Keakuratan Instrumen Asesmen Awal: Validitas dan Reliabilitas dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah SMA melalui Analisis Aiken. Elementary Journal : Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 8(2), 510–515. https://doi.org/10.47178/43RGT059

Permendiktisaintek No. 39. (2025). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Tinggi, Sains, dan Teknologi Nomor 39 Tahun 2025 tentang Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Tinggi. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/333967/permendikti-saintek-no-39-tahun-2025

Pratiwi, M., & Kusumah, L. H. (2024). Enhancing the accreditation of Indonesian private universities through the integration of EduQual and accreditation standards of the BAN-PT. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 10(2), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.21831/REID.V10I2.76406

Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian (Panduan Peneliti, Mahasiswa, dan Psikometrian). Parama Publishing.

Sadika, P. H., Neyland, J. S. C., & Sutrisno, A. (2023). Analisis Kepuasan Pengguna Jasa Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Dengan Metode Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI): (Studi Kasus di Pelabuhan Manado). Jurnal Tekno Mesin, 9(2), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.35793/JTMU.V9I2.48746

Sallis, E. (2014). Total quality management in education: Third edition. Total Quality Management in Education: Third Edition, 1–168. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203417010

Setianah, P. (2023). Peningkatan Kualitas Layanan Pendidikan Tinggi dengan Pendekatan Service Quality (Servqual), IPA dan Quality Function Deployment (QFD). Universitas Mercu Buana Jakarta.

Tjiptono, F. (2019). Pemasaran Jasa : Prinsip, Penerapan, Penelitian. Edisi 2. In Yogyakarta : Penerbit Andi. Andi Publisher.

Tschense, M., & Wallot, S. (2022). Modeling items for text comprehension assessment using confirmatory factor analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 966347. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2022.966347/TEXT

Voss, R., Gruber, T., & Szmigin, I. (2007). Service quality in higher education: The role of student expectations. Journal of Business Research, 60(9), 949–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2007.01.020

Welzant, H., Schindler, L., Puls-Elvidge, S., & Crawford, L. (2011). Definitions of quality in higher education: A synthesis of the literature. Higher Learning Research Communications, 5(3), 2. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v5i3.244

Wibisono, D. (2019). Analisis Kualitas Layanan Pendidikan Menggunakan Matriks Importance Performance Analysis di Sekolah XYZ. Jurnal Optimasi Teknik Industri (JOTI), 1(2), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.30998/JOTI.V1I2.4099

Wijaya, S. (2017). Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Pelayanan Bagian Keuangan Dengan Metode Customer Satisfaction Index. Jurnal Ilmiah Rekayasa Dan Manajemen Sistem Informasi, 3(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.24014/RMSI.V3I1.2757

Downloads

Published

2026-07-18

How to Cite

Muhammad Akram Mukhlis, A., Syahrul, S., & Sappaile, B. I. (2026). Evaluation of the Learning Quality of the Agricultural Industrial Technology Study Program Using Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) And Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA). Jurnal Pendidikan Terapan, 4(3), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.61255/jupiter.v4i3.1441

Issue

Section

Articles