Democratic Culture as a Learning Ecology in Higher Education: A Qualitative Case Study of Students’ Political Literacy with Conceptual Implications for Early-Grade Indonesian Language Pedagogy

Authors

  • St. Haniah Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • Tarman Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • Sulvahrul Amin Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61255/jupiter.v4i4.1472

Keywords:

Democratic Culture, Learning Ecology, Political Literacy, Qualitative Case Study, Conceptual Pedagogy

Abstract

Purpose: This study analyzes how democratic culture in the Sociology Education Study Program of Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar operates as a learning ecology that shapes students’ political literacy. It also formulates conceptual, not experimentally tested, implications for early-grade Indonesian language pedagogy. Methods: The study used a qualitative case-study design involving 24 students from semesters 3, 5, and 7. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, three focus group discussions, participatory observations in four campus democratic arenas, and analysis of student-organization documents. Data were analyzed through Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña’s interactive model by moving from initial codes to categories and five themes. Findings: Democratic culture shaped political literacy through four connected processes: dialogue spaces that trained students to speak, listen, and evaluate arguments; deliberation and negotiation that strengthened participation when facilitation was equal but weakened it when symbolic domination occurred; management of cultural, identity, and political differences through communicative norms; and reflective verification of public and social-media information. The study also found barriers in the form of apathy, seniority, domination by organizationally active students, polarization, and procedural formalism. Contribution: The article contributes a democratic-communicative learning-ecology framework that connects political sociology, cultural sociology, and dialogic language pedagogy. Its pedagogical implication is limited to a conceptual model consisting of dialogic circles, mini-deliberations, diversity-text reading, peer-response writing, and class voice projects.
Abstract views: 20 , PDF downloads: 12

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.

Bowyer, B., & Kahne, J. (2020). The digital dimensions of civic education: Assessing the effects of learning opportunities. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 69, 101162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101162

Chambers, S. (2021). Truth, deliberative democracy, and the virtues of accuracy: Is fake news destroying the public sphere? Political Studies, 69(1), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719890811

Donbavand, S., & Hoskins, B. (2021). Citizenship education for political engagement: A systematic review of controlled trials. Social Sciences, 10(5), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10050151

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books.

Guess, A. M., & Munger, K. (2023). Digital literacy and online political behavior. Political Science Research and Methods, 11(1), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2022.17

Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1. Reason and the rationalization of society. Beacon Press.

Hopp, T., Ferrucci, P., & Vargo, C. J. (2020). Why do people share ideologically extreme, false, and misleading content on social media? A self-report and trace data-based analysis of countermedia content dissemination on Facebook and Twitter. Human Communication Research, 46(4), 357–384. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqz022

Horner, C. G., Galletta, D., Crawford, J., & Shirsat, A. (2021). Emotions: The unexplored fuel of fake news on social media. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38(4), 1039–1066. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2021.1990610

Irsyad, N. A., Munirah, M., & Tarman. (2024). Pengaruh program gerakan literasi Ammaca dan budaya literasi digital melalui pemanfaatan media Chromebook terhadap minat baca siswa SD. Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v4i2.1466

Jati, W. R. (2024). From millennial to Generation Z: The state of digital literacy among youths dealing with disinformation during elections. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.7454/jkmi.v13i1.1228

Karolčík, Š., & Čipková, E. (2025). Politics and political literacy in education from the perspective of the public. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2457560. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2457560

Martínez-Bravo, M. C., Sádaba-Chalezquer, C., & Serrano-Puche, J. (2022). Dimensions of digital literacy in the 21st century competency frameworks. Sustainability, 14(3), 1867. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031867

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

van der Wilt, F., van der Veen, C., van Kruistum, C., & van Oers, B. (2021). Why do children become rejected by their peers? A review of studies into the relationship between oral communicative competence and sociometric status in childhood. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 859–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09579-z

Williams, R. (1989). Resources of hope: Culture, democracy, socialism. Verso.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-13

How to Cite

Haniah, S., Tarman, T., & Amin, S. (2026). Democratic Culture as a Learning Ecology in Higher Education: A Qualitative Case Study of Students’ Political Literacy with Conceptual Implications for Early-Grade Indonesian Language Pedagogy. Jurnal Pendidikan Terapan, 4(4), 187–191. https://doi.org/10.61255/jupiter.v4i4.1472

Issue

Section

Articles