Effects of EduCube Inquiry-Based Learning on Elementary Students' Cube Spatial Visualization, Learning Interest, and Mathematics Achievement: A Quasi-Experimental Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61255/jupiter.v4i3.1534Keywords:
Concrete Manipulatives, Cube Spatial Visualization, Elementary Mathematics, Inquiry-Based Learning, Learning Achievement, Learning InterestAbstract
Spatial visualization is fundamental for elementary geometry learning, yet many students struggle to interpret three-dimensional cube structures because instruction remains dominated by teacher-centered approaches and two-dimensional representations. Although inquiry-based learning, concrete manipulatives, and spatial reasoning have shown educational outcomes, limited empirical evidence has examined their integration while simultaneously investigating students' spatial visualization, learning interest, and mathematics achievement. Accordingly, this study investigated the effects of inquiry-based learning assisted by colorful cube manipulatives on sixth-grade students' learning interest, spatial visualization achievement, and learning responses. A quasi-experimental Matching Only Pretest–Posttest Control Group Design involved 58 sixth-grade students selected through purposive sampling, with 29 students in the experimental group and 29 in the control group. Data were collected using achievement tests, learning-interest and student-response questionnaires, observations, interviews, and documentation and analyzed using descriptive statistics, normality and homogeneity tests, paired- and independent-samples t-tests, normalized gain (N-Gain), and Cohen's d. Significantly higher learning-interest and posttest achievement scores were obtained by the experimental group than by the control group (p < .001). Moderate-to-high learning gains were achieved by 87.9% of students, while average student-response score reached 84.25%, indicating positive perceptions of the learning model. Inquiry-based learning supported by colorful cube manipulatives offers a promising approach for active, meaningful mathematics instruction. Findings should be interpreted considering intact classes from two schools, the absence of random assignment, and post-intervention measurement of learning interest. Results provide empirical evidence supporting the integration of structured inquiry and concrete manipulatives to enhance elementary students' spatial visualization, learning interest, and mathematics achievement.
Abstract views: 0
, 
PDF downloads: 0
Downloads
References
Adawiah, R., Arsyad, N., Dassa, A., & Djam’an, N. (2026). Development of a differentiated mathematics learning model based on students’ learning style characteristics. Frontiers in Education, 11, 1815095. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1815095
Boadu, S. K., Boateng, F. O., & Obeng, B. A. (2026). Modeling students’ interest in mathematics: The role of self-efficacy, mathematics anxiety, cultural and societal perceptions, and relevance of mathematics. Frontiers in Education, 11, 1732581. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1732581
Buckler, S., & Moore, H. (2023). Essentials of research methods in education. SAGE Publications.
Bufasi, E., Lin, T.-J., Benedicic, U., Westerhof, M., Mishra, R., Namsone, D., Dudareva, I., Sorby, S. A., Gumaelius, L., Klapwijk, R. M., Spandaw, J., Bowe, B., O’Kane, C., Duffy, G., Pagkratidou, M., & Buckley, J. (2024). Addressing the complexity of spatial teaching: A narrative review of barriers and enablers. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1306189. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1306189
Campillo-Ferrer, J. M., & Miralles-Martínez, P. (2023). Impact of an inquiry-oriented proposal for promoting technology-enhanced learning in a post-pandemic context. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1204539. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1204539
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Debrenti, E. (2024). Game-based learning experiences in primary mathematics education. Frontiers in Education, 9, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1331312
Field, A. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Gilligan-Lee, K. A., Hawes, Z. C. K., Williams, A. Y., & Farran, E. K. (2023). Hands-on: Investigating the role of physical manipulatives in spatial training. Child Development, 94(5), 1205–1221. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13963
Gómez-Chacón, I. M., Bacelo, A., Marbán, J. M., & Palacios, A. (2024). Inquiry-based mathematics education and attitudes towards mathematics: Tracking profiles for teaching. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 36, 715–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-023-00468-8
Harris, D., Logan, T., & Lowrie, T. (2023). Spatial visualization and measurement of area: A case study in spatialized mathematics instruction. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 70, 101038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101038
Kuzu, O., & Taşdelen, Z. (2026). Enhancing mathematical connection skills through animation-supported instruction: An experimental study. Frontiers in Education, 11, 1830004. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1830004
Lehikoinen, H., Väisänen, P., Havu-Nuutinen, S., Lappalainen, K., & Niemivirta, M. (2025). Developmental relations between mathematics self-concept, interest, and achievement: A comparison of solo- and co-taught classes. Instructional Science, 53, 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-024-09678-4
Manunure, K., & Leung, A. (2024). Integrating inquiry and mathematical modeling when teaching a common topic in lower secondary school: An iSTEM approach. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1376951. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1376951
Medina Herrera, L. M., Juárez Ordóñez, S., & Ruiz-Loza, S. (2024). Enhancing mathematical education with spatial visualization tools. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1229126. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1229126
Mertens, D. M. (2023). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Möhring, W., Moll, L., & Szubielska, M. (2024). Unpacking associations among children’s spatial skills, mathematics, and arithmetic strategies: Decomposition matters. Psychological Research, 88, 1550–1564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-01952-x
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2023). Access and equity in mathematics education. https://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-Positions/Position-Statements/Access-and-Equity-in-Mathematics-Education/
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Pedersen, I. F., & Haavold, P. Ø. (2023). Students’ mathematical beliefs and motivation in the context of inquiry-based mathematics teaching. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 54, 1649–1663. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2023.2189171
Pinilla, R. K. (2024). Spatial reasoning in mathematics standards: Identifying how early elementary educators are systematically supported to teach spatial skills. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1407388. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1407388
Ponte, R., Viseu, F., Neto, T. B., & Aires, A. P. (2023). Revisiting manipulatives in the learning of geometric figures. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1217680. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1217680
Rawlings, A. M., Niemivirta, M., Korhonen, J., Lindskog, M., Tuominen, H., & Mononen, R. (2023). Achievement emotions and arithmetic fluency: Development and parallel processes during the early school years. Learning and Instruction, 86, 101776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101776
Saccardo, F., Decarli, G., Missagia, V. I., Andrao, M., Gini, F., Zancanaro, M., & Franchin, L. (2024). Emotions and interactive tangible tools for math achievement in primary schools. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1440981. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1440981
Schenck, K. E., & Nathan, M. J. (2024). Navigating spatial ability for mathematics education: A review and roadmap. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09935-5
Siller, H.-S., & Ahmad, S. (2024). The effect of concrete and virtual manipulative blended instruction on mathematical achievement for elementary school students. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 24(2), 229–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-024-00336-y
Simpson, A., Shokeen, E., Katirci, N., & Williams-Pierce, C. (2024). Elementary students’ shared understanding of angle during an educational robotics task. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1425307. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1425307
Thom, J. S., McGarvey, L. M., & Markle, J. (2024). Projective geometry and spatial reasoning for STEM learning. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1312845. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1312845
Wang, H., & Star, J. R. (2023). Investigating algorithm-oriented flexibility and structure-informed flexibility in mathematics learning. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 2(1), 16–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263231163593
Yusrina, H., Sutama, Sutopo, A., & Muhibbin, A. (2026). CTMath: Enhancing elementary mathematics and computational thinking skills through a structured Scratch-based model. Frontiers in Education, 11, 1767445. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1767445
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dwi Cahyanti Alfiah, Achmad Buchori , Lina Putriyanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
