Psychological Determinants of Cyberbullying: A Theory of Planned Behavior Study on Intentions and Distress Among University Students in South Sulawesi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61255/jupiter.v4i2.836Keywords:
Behavioral Intention, Cyberbullying, Psychological Distress, Theory of Planned Behavior, University StudentsAbstract
Background: Cyberbullying has emerged as a serious concern in digital communication environments, particularly among university students in developing countries where research on this phenomenon remains limited. The psychological determinants underlying cyberbullying intentions and their consequences for students' psychological health have not been sufficiently examined within a unified theoretical framework.
Purpose: This study examines how attitudes, social norms, and perceived behavioral control influence students' intentions to engage in cyberbullying and how these intentions relate to psychological distress among university students in South Sulawesi, Indonesia.
Methods: A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted with 358 university students from multiple institutions in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM).
Findings: Attitude (β = 0.324, p < 0.001), social norms (β = 0.154, p = 0.015), and perceived behavioral control (β = 0.292, p < 0.001) significantly influenced behavioral intention. Behavioral intention mediated the relationship between attitude and psychological distress (β = 0.064, p = 0.001) and between perceived behavioral control and psychological distress (β = 0.057, p = 0.010), while the mediation of social norms was not significant. The model explained 58.7% of behavioral intention and 32.1% of psychological distress.
Research Implications: Cyberbullying prevention programs should prioritize shifting students' attitudes and reducing perceived behavioral control through digital literacy initiatives and institutional policies that strengthen online accountability.
Originality: This study extends the Theory of Planned Behavior by linking behavioral intention with psychological distress in the context of cyberbullying, contributing empirical evidence from an underexplored cultural and regional context in Indonesia.
Conclusion: Attitude, social norms, and perceived behavioral control are significant determinants of cyberbullying intention, with behavioral intention mediating the relationship between these psychological factors and psychological distress. These findings support the theoretical utility of TPB in digital environments and underscore the need for culturally contextual prevention strategies in Indonesian higher education.
Abstract views: 18
,
PDF downloads: 0
Downloads
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Barlett, C. P., & Gentile, D. A. (2012). Attacking others online: The formation of cyberbullying in late adolescence. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028113
Benitez, J., Henseler, J., Castillo, A., & Schuberth, F. (2020). How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research. Information and Management, 57(2), 103168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.05.003
Festl, R., & Quandt, T. (2016). The Role of Online Communication in Long-Term Cyberbullying Involvement Among Girls and Boys. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(9), 1931–1945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0552-9
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
Hayashi, Y., & Tahmasbi, N. (2022). Psychological Predictors of Bystanders’ Intention to Help Cyberbullying Victims Among College Students: An Application of Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(13–14), NP11333–NP11357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260521992158
Heirman, W., & Walrave, M. (2012). Predicting adolescent perpetration in cyberbullying: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Psicothema, 24(4), 614–620. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23079360
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM : The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28, 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131
Kokkinos, C. M., & Saripanidis, I. (2017). A lifestyle exposure perspective of victimization through Facebook among university students. Do individual differences matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.036
Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618
Langos, C. (2012). Cyberbullying: The challenge to define. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(6), 285–289. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0588
Machackova, H., & Pfetsch, J. (2016). Bystanders’ responses to offline bullying and cyberbullying: The role of empathy and normative beliefs about aggression. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12277
Madon, Z., & Chin, Y. H. (2021). Relationship between Beliefs Underlying Attitude , Subjective Norm , Perceived Behavior Control and Cyberbullying Intention of Adolescents Among Secondary School Students in Selangor , Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences., 1(11), 1691–1705. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i11/11654
Mardianto, Hanurawan, F., Chusniyah, T., Rahmawati, H., & Hutagalung, F. D. (2021). Cyber Aggression between Intentions and Cyber Wellness of Students: An application of TPB Models. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1425a
Martínez-Monteagudo, M. C., Delgado, B., García-Fernández, J. M., & Ruíz-Esteban, C. (2020). Cyberbullying in the University Setting. Relationship With Emotional Problems and Adaptation to the University. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(January). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03074
Olenik-Shemesh, D., Heiman, T., & Eden, S. (2012). Cyberbullying victimisation in adolescence: Relationships with loneliness and depressive mood. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17(3–4), 361–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2012.704227
Pabian, S., & Vandebosch, H. (2016). An Investigation of Short-Term Longitudinal Associations Between Social Anxiety and Victimization and Perpetration of Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(2), 328–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0259-3
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Prestera, G., Amadori, A., Sangiuliano Intra, F., Taverna, L., Basso, D., & Brighi, A. (2025). The impact of social norms and conformity on cyberbullying perpetration among adolescents: an integration of the theory of planned behavior model. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1668615
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Mitchell, R., & Gudergan, S. P. (2020). Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(12), 1617–1643.
Samsudin, E. Z., Yaacob, S. S., Wee, C. X., Nadira, A., Ruzlin, M., Azzani, M., Jamil, A. T., Muzaini, K., Ibrahim, K., Suddin, L. S., Selamat, M. I., Shahril, M., Saman, A., Abdullah, N. N., Ismail, N., Yasin, S. M., Azhar, Z. I., Ismail, Z., Isa, M. R., & Mohamad, M. (2023). Prevalence of cyberbullying victimisation and its association with family dysfunction , health behaviour and psychological distress among young adults in urban Selangor , Malaysia : a cross- sectional study. BMJ Open, 13, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072801
Selkie, E. M., Fales, L., J., & Moreno, M. A. (2017). Cyberbullying Prevalence among United States Middle and High School Aged Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment. Physiology & Behavior, 176(1), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.09.026
Slonje, R., Smith, P. K., & Frisén, A. (2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.024
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 49(4), 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
Virdiyanti, R. (2025). Jurnal Ilmu Psikologi dan Kesehatan Mental Health Dynamics In The Context Of Collectivist. Jurnal Ilmu Psikologi Dan Kesehatan (SIKONTAN), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.47353/sikontan.v3i3.2779
Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-Sectional Studies: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Recommendations. Chest, 158(1), S65–S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012
Wright, M. F. (2014). Predictors of anonymous cyber aggression: The role of adolescents’ beliefs about anonymity, aggression, and the permanency of digital content. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(7), 431–438. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0457
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dwi Ihza Sari Akis, Fathahillah, Dewi Fatmarani Surianto, M. Miftach Fakhri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






