Negotiating Tradition and Digital Technology in Family-Based Informal Learning: an Ethnographic Study of Dayak Kanayant Parenting Practices

Authors

  • Sudirman Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Dwi Surti Junida Universitas Tanjungpura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61255/jupiter.v4i2.952

Keywords:

Dayak Kanayant, Digital Mediation, Educational Technology, Ethnography, Family-Based Learning, Informal Learning, Parenting

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to examine how Dayak Kanayant families in West Kalimantan negotiate traditional parenting values with the influence of digital technology in the context of family-based informal learning. The study responds to the limited attention in educational technology scholarship to indigenous family environments as informal learning spaces shaped by cultural logic, kinship relations, and distinctive forms of digital mediation. Methods:  This study employed a qualitative ethnographic approach in Desa Terap, Toho District, Mempawah Regency, West Kalimantan. Data were collected over four months through in-depth interviews, participant observation, field notes, and documentation involving parents, grandparents, and children. Data analysis was conducted using a thematic-interpretative approach through repeated reading of interview transcripts and field notes, initial coding, theme development, ethnographic interpretation, and triangulation across interviews, observations, and documentation. Findings: The findings show that parenting in Dayak Kanayant families is practiced collectively through the involvement of parents, grandparents, and extended family members. Children learn discipline, respect for elders, cooperation, and cultural responsibility through observation, imitation, and direct participation in family and community activities. The presence of digital technology, particularly smartphones, creates new tensions by shifting some children’s attention from communal activities to screen-based activities. However, digital technology is neither fully rejected nor simply accepted. Families negotiate its use by regulating screen time, prioritizing customary and family obligations, and using digital communication to maintain emotional and educational connections with parents working outside the village. Research Implications: The findings suggest that educational technology should not only be understood as a school-based learning tool, but also as a culturally mediated learning resource within family environments. Therefore, digital literacy and family education programs need to consider kinship structures, intergenerational authority, and the local values of indigenous communities. Originality: This study contributes to educational technology scholarship by showing how indigenous families negotiate digital technology through culturally embedded parenting practices, rather than experiencing technology merely as a disruptive force against tradition.
Abstract views: 2 , PDF downloads: 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aarsand, P. (2011). Parenting and digital games: On children’s game play in US families. Journal of Children and Media, 5(3), 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2011.584382

Atkinson, P. (2015). For ethnography. SAGE Publications.

Blackwell, C. K., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. (2014). Factors influencing digital technology use in early childhood education. Computers & Education, 77, 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.013

Chaudron, S., Di Gioia, R., & Gemo, M. (2018). Young children (0–8) and digital technology: A qualitative study across Europe. Publications Office of the European Union.

Corsaro, W. A. (2018). The sociology of childhood (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dyson, L. E., Grant, S., & Hendriks, M. (2016). Indigenous people and mobile technologies. Routledge.

Gillen, J., & Kucirkova, N. (2018). Percolating spaces: Creative ways of using digital technologies to connect young children’s school and home lives. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(5), 834–846. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12666

Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice (4th ed.). Routledge.

Holloway, D., Green, L., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Zero to eight: Young children and their internet use. EU Kids Online.

Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., boyd, d., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., Horst, H. A., Lange, P. G., Mahendran, D., Martínez, K. Z., Pascoe, C. J., Perkel, D., Robinson, L., Sims, C., & Tripp, L. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. MIT Press.

Junida, D. S., & Suryaningsi, T. (2025). Childcare in the Dayak Bakati indigenous community: A review of government policies and their impact on local culture and children’s rights. In [complete the original book title according to the source]. Emerald Publishing.

Kucirkova, N., & Littleton, K. (2017). Digital personalization in early childhood: Impact on childhood. Bloomsbury Academic.

Lancy, D. F. (2015). The anthropology of childhood: Cherubs, chattel, changelings (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Livingstone, S., & Blum-Ross, A. (2020). Parenting for a digital future: How hopes and fears about technology shape children’s lives. Oxford University Press.

Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children’s internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396

Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., & Staksrud, E. (2018). European research on children’s internet use: Assessing the past and anticipating the future. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1103–1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816685930

Neumann, M. M. (2018). Using tablets and apps to enhance emergent literacy skills in young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 42, 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.10.006

Neumann, M. M., Merchant, G., & Burnett, C. (2017). Young children and tablets: The views of parents and teachers. Early Child Development and Care, 187(9), 1378–1391. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1219735

Nikken, P., & Schols, M. (2015). How and why parents guide the media use of young children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(11), 3423–3435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0144-4

Pauwels, L. (2010). Visual sociology reframed: An analytical synthesis and discussion of visual methods in social and cultural research. Sociological Methods & Research, 38(4), 545–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124110366233

Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.

Sobo, E. J., & de Munck, V. C. (1998). The forest of methods. AltaMira Press.

Soyoof, A., Reynolds, B. L., Neumann, M. M., Scull, J., & McLay, K. (2024). The impact of parent mediation on young children’s home digital literacy practices and learning: A narrative review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(1), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12866

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wartella, E., Rideout, V., Lauricella, A. R., & Connell, S. L. (2013). Parenting in the age of digital technology. Center on Media and Human Development, Northwestern University.

Yelland, N. (2018). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Young children and multimodal learning with tablets. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(5), 847–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12635

Downloads

Published

2026-05-12

How to Cite

Sudirman, S., & Surti Junida, D. (2026). Negotiating Tradition and Digital Technology in Family-Based Informal Learning: an Ethnographic Study of Dayak Kanayant Parenting Practices. Jurnal Pendidikan Terapan, 4(2), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.61255/jupiter.v4i2.952

Issue

Section

Articles