Why Ecosystem Access Fails: MSME Resource Conversion in Eastern Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61255/jeemba.v4i4.1432Keywords:
Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, MSMEs, Resource Conversion, Digital Process Innovation, Eastern IndonesiaAbstract
Purpose – Ecosystem programs widen access to training, finance, networks, and digital tools, but access does not explain how a resource enters daily work. This study examines resource conversion and where it stalls or changes path.
Design/methodology/approach – The study used an abductive comparative multiple-case design. Fourteen MSMEs were screened and 13 cases from four provinces were retained. The evidence includes 35 interviews with owners, employees, partners, and ecosystem actors, totaling 34 hours and 43 minutes. Analysis combined case chronologies, incident coding, cross-case matrices, and negative-case checks.
Findings/Results – Sustained conversion involved local translation and recombination, a delegated trial, and routine embedding. Informal networks sometimes offered another entry. Owner bottlenecks, low operational slack, poor task-technology fit, and fragmented support were associated with stalled or symbolic use. The fragile case showed that a working system may still fail when knowledge and authority remain concentrated.
Originality/Value – Resource conversion is defined as the bounded work between access and a repeatable routine. It excludes acquisition, broad strategic reconfiguration, and firm performance itself. The model distinguishes core, alternative, failure, fragile, recovery, and feedback movements.
Abstract views: 12
,
PDF downloads: 19
Downloads
References
Adner, R. 2017. Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management 43(1): 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
Autio, E., S. Nambisan, L. D. W. Thomas, & M. Wright. 2018. Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 12(1): 72–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1266
Baker, T. & R. E. Nelson. 2005. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly 50(3): 329–366. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329
Cohen, W. M. & D. A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
Crupi, A., N. Del Sarto, A. Di Minin, G. L. Gregori, D. Lepore, L. Marinelli, & F. Spigarelli. 2020. The digital transformation of SMEs—A new knowledge broker called the digital innovation hub. Journal of Knowledge Management 24(6): 1263–1288. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2019-0623
Do, H., B. Nguyen, & M. Dao. 2026. Social capital and SME innovations: The importance of knowledge combination and customer demands. Small Business Economics 66(1): 323–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-025-01105-3
Dubois, A. & L.-E. Gadde. 2002. Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research 55(7): 553–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00195-8
Dwiputri, R. M., I. Irawati, E. Pariyanti, & A. Barros. 2026. Digital readiness catalyzing halal practices and digital payment for MSME financial performance. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management Business and Accounting 4(4): 449–472. https://doi.org/10.61255/jeemba.v4i4.1054
Eisenhardt, K. M. & M. E. Graebner. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal 50(1): 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
Eller, R., P. Alford, A. Kallmünzer, & M. Peters. 2020. Antecedents, consequences, and challenges of small and medium-sized enterprise digitalization. Journal of Business Research 112: 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.004
Flaminiano, J. P. C. 2024. Entrepreneurial bricolage: A key to innovation for SMEs in a developing economy. Small Business International Review 8(1): e645. https://doi.org/10.26784/sbir.v8i1.645
Garzoni, A., I. De Turi, G. Secundo, & P. Del Vecchio. 2020. Fostering digital transformation of SMEs: A four levels approach. Management Decision 58(8): 1543–1562. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2019-0939
Gioia, D. A., K. G. Corley, & A. L. Hamilton. 2013. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods 16(1): 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
Grant, R. M. 1996. Prospering in dynamically competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science 7(4): 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.4.375
Kahveci, E. 2025. Digital transformation in SMEs: Enablers, interconnections, and a framework for sustainable competitive advantage. Administrative Sciences 15(3): 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15030107
Klein, K. J. & J. S. Sorra. 1996. The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review 21(4): 1055–1080. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9704071863
Langley, A. 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review 24(4): 691–710. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2553248
Li, L., F. Su, W. Zhang, & J.-Y. Mao. 2018. Digital transformation by SME entrepreneurs: A capability perspective. Information Systems Journal 28(6): 1129–1157. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12153
Matarazzo, M., L. Penco, G. Profumo, & R. Quaglia. 2021. Digital transformation and customer value creation in Made in Italy SMEs: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Business Research 123: 642–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.033
Plekhanov, D., H. Franke, & T. H. Netland. 2023. Digital transformation: A review and research agenda. European Management Journal 41(6): 821–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.09.007
Radicic, D. & S. Petković. 2023. Impact of digitalization on technological innovations in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Technological Forecasting and Social Change 191: 122474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122474
Sirmon, D. G., M. A. Hitt, R. D. Ireland, & B. A. Gilbert. 2011. Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Journal of Management 37(5): 1390–1412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385695
Sommer, C., T. Chilla, L. Birnbaum, & S. Kröner. 2025. Digital social innovations in rural areas—Process tracing and mapping critical junctures. Journal of Rural Studies 114: 103510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103510
Spigel, B. & R. Harrison. 2018. Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 12(1): 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1268
Stam, E. & A. van de Ven. 2021. Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements. Small Business Economics 56(2): 809–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00270-6
Teece, D. J. 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of sustainable enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 28(13): 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Vu, P. M., N. T. Binh, N. T. Duong, & N. H. Huy. 2023. How social capital affects innovation, marketing and entrepreneurial orientation: The case of SMEs in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship 12: 81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00350-8
Wibowo, B. Y., N. A. Setyawan, & D. F. Wiedayanti. 2026. Digital marketing strategy in increasing brand awareness of MSME local products. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management Business and Accounting 4(2): 26–38. https://doi.org/10.61255/jeemba.v4i2.1013
Wurth, B., E. Stam, & B. Spigel. 2022. Toward an entrepreneurial ecosystem research program. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 46(3): 729–778. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258721998948
Wurth, B., E. Stam, & B. Spigel. 2023. Entrepreneurial ecosystem mechanisms. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship 19(3): 224–339. https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000089
Xie, X., Y. Han, A. Anderson, & S. Ribeiro-Navarrete. 2022. Digital platforms and SMEs’ business model innovation: Exploring the mediating mechanisms of capability reconfiguration. International Journal of Information Management 65: 102513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102513
Zahra, S. A. & G. George. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review 27(2): 185–203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jacline I. Sumual, George Kawung, Mauna Th.B. Maramis

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
















Email: fadhila.della@gmail.com, andika.isma@unm.ac.id