Closing the Investment Conversion Gap: An Integrative Framework for Regional Capability and Competitiveness Development

Albert Yansen; Dokman Marulitua Situmorang

doi:10.61255/jeemba.v4i6.1948

Authors

Albert Yansen Universitas Mohammad Husni Thamrin, Indonesia
Dokman Marulitua Situmorang Universitas SATU Pontianak, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61255/jeemba.v4i6.1948

Keywords:

Investment Conversion, Regional Capability, Absorptive Capacity, Local Value Capture, Regional Competitiveness

Abstract

Purpose – This conceptual article examines the gap between investment realization and the development of productive capabilities that can be retained by firms, workers, suppliers, and institutions in a region. It asks how investment-related opportunities may be converted into locally embedded capability rather than assuming that capital inflows automatically produce broad development.
Design/methodology/approach – The article develops a conceptual synthesis across literature on absorptive capacity and learning, supplier development and local linkages, place-based regional development, implementation governance, and digital monitoring. The article is a theory-building conceptual synthesis, not a systematic review or statistical aggregation of effect sizes.
Finding/Results – The article proposes the Regional Investment Conversion Debottlenecking Model (RICDM), an adaptive architecture linking investment inputs, conversion mechanisms, governance through an Investment Conversion Compact (ICC), digital execution, and the monitoring of outputs, capability outcomes, and longer-term regional impacts. The framework distinguishes project-level delivery from firm- and worker-level capability changes and from downstream regionaloutcomes.
Originality/Value – The contribution is to define investment conversion as an intermediate, multi-actor process and specify how its mechanisms, governance arrangements, boundary conditions, and outcome levels can be investigated. RICDM is a conceptual proposition requiring empirical validation, not a demonstrated causal intervention.

Abstract views: 11 ,

PDF downloads: 7

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bailey, D., Pitelis, C. N., & Tomlinson, P. R. (2023). Place-based industrial and regional strategy – levelling the playing field. Regional Studies, 57(6), 977–983. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2168260

Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez‐Pose, A. (2012). The Case For Regional Development Intervention: Place‐Based VERSUS PLACE‐NEUTRAL APPROACHES*. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x

Borsekova, K., Korony, S., & Lawson, C. W. (2024). In search of key performance indicators of regional competitiveness in the European Union. Journal of Regional Science, 64(3), 961–986. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12692

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553

Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290500049805

Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2021). A Systematic Review of the Literature on Digital Transformation: Insights and Implications for Strategy and Organizational Change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1159–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639

Humphrey, J., & Schmitz, H. (2002). How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters? Regional Studies, 36(9), 1017–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340022000022198

Javorcik, B. S. (2004). Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers Through Backward Linkages. American Economic Review, 94(3), 605–627. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041464605

Kraus, S., Durst, S., Ferreira, J. J., Veiga, P., Kailer, N., & Weinmann, A. (2022). Digital transformation in business and management research: An overview of the current status quo. International Journal of Information Management, 63, 102466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102466

Nguyen, C. V., Tran, T. Q., & Vu, H. Van. (2024). Does foreign direct investment benefit local firms? Evidence from a natural experiment study. The World Economy, 47(3), 1191–1246. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13487

OECD. (2023). Place-Based Policies for the Future (OECD Regional Development Papers, Vol. 78). https://doi.org/10.1787/9b0b0107-en

Pietrobelli, C., & Rabellotti, R. (2011). Global Value Chains Meet Innovation Systems: Are There Learning Opportunities for Developing Countries? World Development, 39(7), 1261–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.05.013

Qiao, Y., Ascani, A., & Morrison, A. (2024). External linkages and regional diversification in China: The role of foreign multinational enterprises. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 56(4), 1077–1101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X231223621

Saito, H., & Matsuura, T. (2025). Foreign Direct Investment and Quality‐Upgrading Spillovers in Indonesia. The World Economy, 48(5), 1127–1138. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13688

Sheng, Y., Yang, X., Chih, Y., & Zhang, J. (2024). Foreign direct investment spillovers and regional innovation in China: The spatial moderating role of absorptive capacity. Review of Development Economics, 28(4), 1803–1837. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13122

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039