Understanding and Accepting Employee Coopetition Paradox: Effects on Work Motivation and Job Happiness

Damaruci Damaruci; Nur Hasan Kurniawan; Harry Wiyanto; Enkky Sasono Anas Wijaya

doi:10.61255/jeemba.v4i6.2029

Authors

Damaruci STIE GICI, Indonesia
Nur Hasan Kurniawan Universitas Nusa Putra, Indonesia
Harry Wiyanto Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen LABORA, Indonesia
Enkky Sasono Anas Wijaya Universitas Panca Bhakti, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61255/jeemba.v4i6.2029

Keywords:

Employee Coopetition, Paradox, Work Motivation, Job Happiness

Abstract

Purpose – This study investigates how employees’ understanding and acceptance of the coopetition paradox influence work motivation and job happiness. Employee coopetition refers to the simultaneous experience of cooperation and competition in workplace relationships, requiring employees to cognitively and psychologically manage competing demands.

Design/methodology/approach – This study employs a quantitative research approach using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The proposed model examines the direct effects of understanding and acceptance of the coopetition paradox on work motivation and job happiness, as well as the mediating role of work motivation. The illustrative analysis was based on 300 hypothetical valid respondents and tested seven proposed hypotheses using bootstrapping procedures.

Findings/Results – The illustrative results indicate that both understanding and acceptance of the coopetition paradox positively influence work motivation, with acceptance showing a stronger effect. Both variables also have positive direct effects on job happiness, while work motivation demonstrates the strongest direct effect on job happiness. Furthermore, work motivation mediates the relationships between understanding and acceptance of the coopetition paradox and job happiness, with a stronger mediation effect for acceptance. These findings are consistent with research emphasizing the importance of employee motivation and psychological factors in shaping job satisfaction and happiness.

Originality/Value – This study contributes to the coopetition literature by shifting attention from organizational-level coopetition toward employees’ cognitive understanding and psychological acceptance of the coopetition paradox. It also highlights work motivation as an important mechanism linking coopetitive experiences to employee happiness. The numerical findings remain provisional and require validation using actual empirical survey data.

Abstract views: 25 ,

PDF downloads: 12

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abgeller, N., Saunders, M., Donnelly, R., & Dobbins, T. (2026). Attributional sense-making of distrust in professional service firms: Working in a coopetitive paradox. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 99(1), Article e70086. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.70086

Ahmad, R. A. R., Khoiruman, M. A., & Uslan, U. (2026). Effectiveness of using digital-based interactive media in improving fifth grade elementary school students' English-speaking skills. International Journal of Educational Practice and Policy, 4(2), 233-251.

Bahar, S., Efendi, A., Agusman, Idwan, Makmur, M., & Sunik. (2025). Bridging internal constraints and performance: A SEM-PLS analysis of public infrastructure projects in the Buton Islands. Journal of Novel Engineering Science and Technology, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.56741/jnest.v4i03.1263

Crick, J. M., & Crick, D. (2019). Developing and validating a multi-dimensional measure of coopetition. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 34(4), 665–680. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-07-2018-0217

Crick, J. M., & Crick, D. (2020). The yin and yang nature of coopetition activities: Non-linear effects and the moderating role of competitive intensity for internationalised firms. International Marketing Review, 38(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-01-2019-0018

Crick, J. M., Crick, D., & Chaudhry, S. (2020). The dark-side of coopetition: It’s not what you say, but the way that you do it. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 30, 22–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2019.1642936

David, E. M., Kim, T.-Y., Rodgers, M. S., & Chen, T. (2020). Helping while competing? The complex effects of competitive climates on the prosocial identity and performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12675

Faliza, N. (2023). Can organizational culture encourage Islamic banking performance?: The role of organizational commitment as mediation. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i6.2307

Geng, Z., Wang, Y., Fan, Y., & Shan, C. (2022). Motivation and hindrance: The mixed blessing of paradoxical leader behaviour for workplace creativity in China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 29, 206–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2022.2134965

Hagger, M. S., & McAnally, K. (2026). Self-determination theory and workplace outcomes: A meta-analysis. Stress and Health, 42(1), Article e70151. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.70151

Irawan, D. H., & Khoiruman, M. A. (2026). Strategies for Improving the English Competence of Vocational High School Students at SMK Sritanjung Banyuwangi. ANTHOR: Education and Learning Journal, 5(4), 1525-1532.

Khoiruman, M. A., Riyawi, M. R., & Satriyo, G. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Animation in English Learning: Innovation in the Merdeka Curriculum Implementation. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(1), 1696-1709.

Kohnen, D., De Witte, H., Schaufeli, W. B., Dello, S., Bruyneel, L., & Sermeus, W. (2024). Engaging leadership and nurse well-being: The role of the work environment and work motivation—A cross-sectional study. Human Resources for Health, 22, Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-023-00886-6

Melkić, S., Dragičević Rogge, N., & Marić, M. (2026). Individual-level paradoxes and employee performance outcomes: Testing sufficiency and necessity conditions across Croatian organisations. Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, 29(1), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.2478/zireb-2026-0009

Nunes, P. M., Proença, T., & Carozzo-Todaro, M. E. (2024). A systematic review on well-being and ill-being in working contexts: Contributions of self-determination theory. Personnel Review, 53(2), 375–419. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2021-0812

Pratignyo, L. S. (2026). Enhancing parameter precision in PLS-SEM through methodological refinement. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 7(3), 748–758. https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v7i3.2256

Raza-Ullah, T. (2021). When does (not) a coopetitive relationship matter to performance? An empirical investigation of the role of multidimensional trust and distrust. Industrial Marketing Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.03.004

Raza-Ullah, T., Bengtsson, M., & Gnyawali, D. R. (2020). The nature, consequences, and management of emotions in interfirm paradoxical relationships—A conceptual framework. Scandinavian Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2020.101127

Raza-Ullah, T., Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2014). The coopetition paradox and tension in coopetition at multiple levels. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.11.001

Santos, T., Santos, E., Sousa, M., & Oliveira, M. (2024). The mediating effect of motivation between internal communication and job satisfaction. Administrative Sciences, 14(4), Article 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14040069

Smiljic, S., Aas, T. H., & Mention, A.-L. (2022). Coopetitive tensions across project phases: A paradox perspective. Industrial Marketing Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.06.017

Tarek, B. S. N., Muzakki, M., & Herachwati, N. (2025). Supervisor support, meaningful work, and happiness in employee engagement. RISET: Jurnal Aplikasi Ekonomi, Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 7(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.37641/riset.v7i1.2586

van den Broeck, A., Howard, J. L., Van Vaerenbergh, Y., Leroy, H., & Gagné, M. (2021). Beyond intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis on self-determination theory’s multidimensional conceptualization of work motivation. Organizational Psychology Review, 11(3), 240–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866211006173

van der Vaart, L., Innstrand, S. T., & Christensen, M. (2025). A symphony of fire, ice, and fog: How leaders' interpersonal styles shape psychological needs and motivation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 66(6), 826–841. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.13123

Wijaya, R., & Afif, N. (2025). Strengthening consumer trust in halal products to support local economic sustainability: PLS-SEM approach to culinary MSMEs in Purwokerto. The International Conference on Sustainable Economics Management and Accounting Proceeding. https://doi.org/10.32424/icsema.1.1.220

Yao, G., Zhao, H., Hu, Y., & Zheng, X. (2023). Exploring knowledge sharing and hiding on employees’ creative behaviors: A coopetition perspective. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100447

Yu, C., Arshad, M. A. bin, Yao, W., & Zhao, M. (2024). Exploring the path to employee happiness: A review of employee well-being research. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(3), 496–508. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i3/20868

Zhang, M., Zhang, J., He, S., Li, X., & Zhang, X. (2025). The path and boundary of the intra-team co-opetition relationship affecting employee innovation behavior: A moderated mediation model. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 59, Article e70012. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.70012