Compassionate Leadership, Self-Efficacy, and Voice Behaviour among Female Nurses and Midwives: Mediating Role of Employee Well-Being
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61255/jeemba.v4i6.2048Keywords:
Compassionate Leadership, Employee Voice Behaviour, Employee Well-Being, Self-EfficacyAbstract
Purpose - This study examines the relationships of self-efficacy and compassionate leadership with employee voice behaviour and investigates the mediating role of employee well-being among female nurses and midwives in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Drawing on the desire fulfillment perspective, the study integrates personal and social resources in explaining constructive employee voice.
Design/methodology/approach - A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted among 240 female nurses and midwives selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using online and offline questionnaires between January and August 2025 and analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS.
Finding/Results - Self-efficacy and compassionate leadership are positively associated with employee well-being and employee voice behaviour, while employee well-being is positively associated with voice behaviour. Employee well-being shows significant indirect relationships linking both self-efficacy and compassionate leadership with employee voice behaviour. Because the corresponding direct and indirect relationships remain significant and operate in the same positive direction, the observed pattern is consistent with complementary partial mediation in both pathways.
Originality/Value - This study integrates self-efficacy as a personal resource and compassionate leadership as a social resource within a single model of employee voice. The observed relationships are consistent with the desire fulfillment perspective, with employee well-being representing an intervening statistical pathway linking these resources with constructive voice behaviour among female nurses and midwives in healthcare settings.
Abstract views: 0
,
PDF downloads: 0
Downloads
References
Badru, A. F., Karadas, G., & Olugbade, O. A. (2022). Employee voice: The impact of high-performance work systems and organisational engagement climate. The Service Industries Journal, 44(7–8), 563–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2022.2056163
Botero, I. C., & Van Dyne, L. (2009). Employee Voice Behavior. Management Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 84–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909335415
Brunetto, Y., Farr-Wharton, R., & Shacklock, K. (2011). Using the Harvard HRM model to conceptualise the impact of changes to supervision upon HRM outcomes for different types of Australian public sector employees. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(3), 553–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.543633
Dedahanov, A. T., Rhee, C., & Gapurjanova, N. (2019). Job autonomy and employee voice: is work-related self-efficacy a missing link? Management Decision, 57(9), 2401–2413. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2017-0607
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
Duan, J., Li, C., Xu, Y., & Wu, C. (2017). Transformational leadership and employee voice behavior: A Pygmalion mechanism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(5), 650–670. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2157
Duan, J., Wang, X., Brinsfield, C. T., & Liu, S. (2020). How Enhancing Employee Well-Being Can Encourage Voice Behavior: A Desire Fulfillment Perspective. Human Performance, 33(5), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2020.1811708
Eibl, B., Lang, F. R., & Niessen, C. (2020). Employee voice at work: the role of employees’ gender, self-efficacy beliefs, and leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(4), 570–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1733979
Guo, Y., & Wang, W. (2022). Organisational compassion and employee voice behaviour: The mediating role of perceived insider status and felt responsibility. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 32(3), 263–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2021.2017601
Gyensare, M. A., Adomako, S., & Amankwah-Amoah, J. (2023). Green HRM practices, employee well-being, and sustainable work behavior: Examining the moderating role of resource commitment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(4), 3129–3141. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3642
Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
Kock, N. (2015). Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
Nisar, A., Abid, G., Elahi, N. S., Ahsan Athar, M., & Farooqi, S. (2020). Impact of Compassion on Voice Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040148
Pansini, M., Buonomo, I., & Benevene, P. (2024). Fostering Sustainable Workplace Through Leaders’ Compassionate Behaviors: Understanding the Role of Employee Well-Being and Work Engagement. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(23), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310697
Prouska, R., Nyfoudi, M., Psychogios, A., Szamosi, L. T., & Wilkinson, A. (2023). Solidarity in Action at a Time of Crisis: The Role of Employee Voice in Relation to Communication and Horizontal Solidarity Behaviour. British Journal of Management, 34(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12598
Sansó, N., Leiva, J. P., Vidal-Blanco, G., Galiana, L., & West, M. (2022). The measurement of compassionate leadership: Adaptation and Spanish validation of the compassionate leadership self-reported scale. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 36(4), 1165–1179. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.13079
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). NFER-NELSON.
Shuck, B., Alagaraja, M., Immekus, J., Cumberland, D., & Honeycutt‐Elliott, M. (2019). Does Compassion Matter in Leadership? A Two‐Stage Sequential Equal Status Mixed Method Exploratory Study of Compassionate Leader Behavior and Connections to Performance in Human Resource Development. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 30(4), 537–564. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21369
Wang, D., Gan, C., & Wu, C. (2016). LMX and employee voice. Personnel Review, 45(3), 605–615. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2014-0255
Wang, D., Gan, C., Wu, C., & Wang, D. (2015). Ethical Leadership and Employee Voice: Employee Self-Efficacy and Self-Impact as Mediators. Psychological Reports, 116(3), 751–767. https://doi.org/10.2466/01.07.PR0.116k29w9
Wang, W., Kang, S.-W., & Choi, S. B. (2022). Servant Leadership and Creativity: A Study of the Sequential Mediating Roles of Psychological Safety and Employee Well-Being. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 807070. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.807070
Wee, E. X. M., & Fehr, R. (2021). Compassion during difficult times: Team compassion behavior, suffering, supervisory dependence, and employee voice during COVID-19. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(12), 1805–1820. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001001
Xu, J., Xie, B., Yang, Y., & Li, L. (2021). Voice More and Be Happier: How Employee Voice Influences Psychological Well-Being in the Workplace. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 23(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.32604/IJMHP.2021.013518
Zainal, H., Basriani, A., Rahmat, A., & Yadi, E. (2023). Ethical Leadership And Voice Behavior: Mediating Psychological Safety And Ethical Culture. Jurnal Manajemen, 27(3), 493–514. https://doi.org/10.24912/jm.v27i3.1448
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Melda Aulia Ramadhani, Saida Zainurossalamia ZA, Robiansyah, Muhammad Rinaldi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
