Mathematical Critical Thinking of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Students: Component Profile and Difficulties in Open-Ended Mathematics Tasks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61255/jupiter.v4i4.2028Keywords:
Mathematical Critical Thinking, Open-Ended Mathematics Tasks, Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, Elementary Education, Qualitative Descriptive StudyAbstract
Purpose. This study describes the mathematical critical thinking profile of fifth-grade students in a madrasah ibtidaiyah and identifies the difficulties they experience when solving open-ended mathematics tasks, an area rarely examined in non-public elementary schools.
Methods. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed with 27 fifth-grade students of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Hidayatul Mubtadiin, an Islamic elementary school under the Ministry of Religious Affairs of Indonesia. Critical thinking was examined using Facione's framework covering interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, and explanation. Data were collected through an open-ended prism problem instrument validated by two mathematics education experts, followed by semi-structured interviews with the classroom teacher and nine selected students. The interactive analysis model of Miles and Huberman was used with source and method triangulation.
Findings. Critical thinking developed unevenly across the five components. Evaluation and inference appeared relatively well developed, whereas interpretation consistently emerged as the weakest component across all performance levels; even high-performing students found it difficult to articulate the meaning of mathematical information. The pattern suggests that critical thinking does not automatically follow content mastery, but requires deliberately designed instructional support.
Research Implications. Mathematics instruction in elementary madrasah should explicitly scaffold interpretive and analytical processes, for example by training students to restate problems, identify relevant information, and explain their reasoning before engaging in higher-order evaluation.
Originality. Unlike studies that rely on public elementary schools or written-test scores alone, this study combines a validated open-ended instrument with interviews to profile critical thinking difficulties in the under-represented madrasah ibtidaiyah context.
Abstract views: 4
, 
PDF downloads: 0
Downloads
References
Abidin, Z., Wiarsih, N., Faishol, R., & Baharun, H. (2024). Enhancing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in the Implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum in Madrasah. Al-Mudarris (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Islam), 7(2), 177–196.
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Waddington, D. I., Wade, C. A., & Persson, T. (2015). Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 275–314. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314551063
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: A Vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction (The Delphi Report). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED315423
Fajari, L. E. W. (2021). Critical Thinking Skills and Their Impacts on Elementary School Students. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2021.18.2.6
Hardianto, H., Sabar, N., & Safitri, R. D. (2024). Deskripsi Proses Berpikir Kritis dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika berdasarkan Kemampuan Awal Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 7(1), 465–477. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.7.1.2024.4507
Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Information Age Publishing.
Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Rapor Pendidikan Indonesia 2023. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Lestari, F., Alim, J. A., & Noviyanti, M. (2024). Implementation of Differentiated Learning to Enhance Elementary School Students’ Mathematical Critical and Creative Thinking Skills. International Journal of Elementary Education, 8(1), 178–187. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v8i1.64295
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications.
Liu, Q., Wang, F., Lin, F., Yao, C., & Wang, Y. (2022). Research on Differentiated Training Program of Primary School Mathematics Education Based on Artificial Intelligence. Int. Conf. Inf. Educ. Technol., ICIET, 268–273. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIET55102.2022.9779050
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results: The state of learning and equity in education (Volume I). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-Century Skills Requires 21st-Century Teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400203
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics (Reprint). Journal of Education, 196(2), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600202
Sitorus, F. D., Hasratuddin, H., & Azhar, E. (2024). Pengembangan LKPD Berbasis HOTS melalui CTL untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Penalaran Matematis Peserta Didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan (JIIP), 7(4), 3695–3701. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v7i4.4297
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Annisa Nurfitriani, Turmudi, Verra Wulandary , Asep Nurhuda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
