Topic-Level Effectiveness of the Entrepreneur Development Class in Indonesia's Wirausaha Merdeka Program

Dhanang Eka Putra; Hariyono Rakhmad; Dessy Putri Andini; Refa Firgiyanto; Huda Ahmad Hudori; Elly Antika; Mochamad Rizal Umami; Nanik Anita Mukhlisoh; Dwi Putro Sarwo Setyohadi; Risse Entikaria Rachmanita

doi:10.61255/jeemba.v4i4.1421

Authors

Dhanang Eka Putra Politeknik Negeri Jember
Hariyono Rakhmad Politeknik Negeri Jember
Dessy Putri Andini Politeknik Negeri Jember
Refa Firgiyanto Politeknik Negeri Jember
Huda Ahmad Hudori Politeknik Negeri Jember
Elly Antika Politeknik Negeri Jember
Mochamad Rizal Umami Politeknik Negeri Jember
Nanik Anita Mukhlisoh Politeknik Negeri Jember
Dwi Putro Sarwo Setyohadi Politeknik Negeri Jember
Risse Entikaria Rachmanita Politeknik Negeri Jember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61255/jeemba.v4i4.1421

Keywords:

entrepreneurship education, vocational higher education, pre-test–post-test, normalized gain, Wirausaha Merdeka

Abstract

Purpose – This study evaluates the effectiveness of the Entrepreneur Development Class (EDC), the foundational learning phase of Indonesia’s Wirausaha Merdeka program, by examining topic-level learning gains across ten instructional modules. The study responds to persistent limitations in entrepreneurship education evaluation, including the dominance of perception-based measures, the reliance on aggregate outcomes, the limited empirical evidence on Wirausaha Merdeka, and the limited use of normalized gain analysis in assessing instructional effectiveness.

Design/methodology/approach – A quantitative one-group pre-test–post-test design was employed using a complete cohort of 550 students from twelve vocational higher education institutions participating in the 2024 Wirausaha Merdeka program coordinated by Politeknik Negeri Jember. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, paired-samples t-tests, Hake’s normalized gain (g), and Cohen’s d effect size.

Findings/Results – The overall mean score increased from 70.40 to 95.25, yielding a high normalized gain (g = 0.84) and a very large effect size (d = 1.70). Business Idea Development emerged as the most effective module (g = 0.90), whereas Pondasi Bisnis Berkah produced the lowest gain (g = 0.68). The findings suggest that instructional effectiveness varies across competency domains and is influenced by both baseline knowledge and the characteristics of the learning outcomes targeted.

Originality/Value – This study contributes to entrepreneurship education research by introducing a topic-level evaluation framework that combines objective knowledge assessment, normalized gain analysis, effect-size estimation, and significance testing. The approach provides a more diagnostic understanding of instructional effectiveness than aggregate program-level measures and offers practical guidance for curriculum improvement, quality assurance, and policy evaluation in large-scale vocational entrepreneurship programs.

Abstract views: 40 ,

PDF downloads: 23

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akram, H. W., & Hye, M. N. (2026). Entrepreneurship education as a moderating mechanism in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions: A systematic integrative review with implications for sustainability in emerging economies with special reference to Oman. Administrative Sciences, 16(2), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16020105

Ariansyah, K., Wismayanti, Y. F., Savitri, R., Listanto, V., Aswin, A., Ahad, M. P. Y., & Cahyarini, B. R. (2024). Comparing labor market performance of vocational and general school graduates in Indonesia: Insights from stable and crisis conditions. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 16(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-024-00160-6

Astin, A. W., & Antonio, A. L. (2012). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Berita resmi statistik No. 44/05/Th. XXVIII: Keadaan ketenagakerjaan Indonesia Februari 2025. Badan Pusat Statistik.

Bell, R., & Cui, J. (2023). Addressing progressive educational reforms: Fusing acquisition approaches and participation in Chinese entrepreneurship education. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(1), 100748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100748

Byrne, E. M., Jensen, H., Thomsen, B. S., & Ramchandani, P. G. (2023). Educational interventions involving physical manipulatives for improving children’s learning and development: A scoping review. Review of Education, 11(2), e3400. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3400

Carpenter, A., & Wilson, R. (2022). A systematic review looking at the effect of entrepreneurship education on higher education student. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(2), 100541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100541

Chatzipanagiotou, P., & Roussakis, Y. (2026). Educational leadership for evidence-informed higher education in Europe: A review of policies and practices. Trends in Higher Education, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu5020048

Cheng, P., & Chen, L. (2026). Effectiveness of pre-test and post-test strategies in programming education: A five-year longitudinal study. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 34(1), e70139. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.70139

Chukwuedo, S. O., Nnajiofor, F. N., Auta, M. A., & Odogwu, I. C. (2023). Training prospective technical education graduates for school-to-work transition: Insights from university–industry links. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 13(2), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-06-2022-0125

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cordeiro, A., Ferreira, Y. S., Leite, R., Almeida, L., Catapan, M., Siqueira, A., Silva, T., & Winkler, I. (2025). Immersive technologies for evaluating industrial safety training in high-risk environments: A review on opportunities and challenges. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2025.1726058

Dwikoranto, D. (2022). The effectiveness of the entrepreneurship MBKM lecture model: Alternatives to improve student creativity competencies during the pandemic Covid-19. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 10(2), 327. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v10i2.4993

Fayolle, A., & Gailly, B. (2015). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial attitudes and intention: Hysteresis and persistence. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 75–93.

Gupta, D., Sharda, D., Kaur, N., & Bansal, R. (2026). Evaluating the effectiveness of the medium of instruction on learning outcomes in technical subjects among Indian undergraduates: A quasi-experimental cross-over study. International Journal of Educational Development, 123, 103589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2026.103589

Hallam, C., Zanella, G., Dorantes Dosamantes, C. A., & Cardenas, C. (2016). Measuring entrepreneurial intent? Temporal construal theory shows it depends on your timing. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 22(5), 671–697. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-09-2015-0202

Hanisch, M. (2024). Prescriptive theorizing in management research: A new impetus for addressing grand challenges. Journal of Management Studies, 61(4), 1692–1716. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13035

Hietanen, L., & Järvi, T. (2015). Contextualizing entrepreneurial learning in basic and vocational education. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 9(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-03-2013-0006

Huff, T., & Tseng, D. C. Y. (2026). Active learning in open digital textbooks: Designing for learner engagement and motivation using H5P. TechTrends, 70(1), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01144-3

Kovalchuk, V., Maslich, S. V., Tkachenko, N. M., Shevchuk, S. S., & Shchypska, T. P. (2022). Vocational education in the context of modern problems and challenges. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 11(8), 329–338. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v11n8p329

Kozlinska, I., Rebmann, A., & Mets, T. (2023). Entrepreneurial competencies and employment status of business graduates: The role of experiential entrepreneurship pedagogy. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 35(5), 724–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2020.1821159

Kurjono, Utama, D. H., & Muntashofi, B. (2023). The influence of entrepreneurial values and subjective norms on entrepreneurial intentions. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-234-7_170

Liñán, F., & Chen, Y. (2009). Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00318.x

Mananda, I. G. P. B. S., & Mahadewi, N. P. E. (2023). Developing a creative entrepreneurship education model to enhance student’s creativity and innovation for successful completion of the independent entrepreneurship MBKM program. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(Special Issue), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9iSpecialIssue.5705

Maritz, A., & Brown, C. (2013). Enhancing entrepreneurial self-efficacy through vocational entrepreneurship education programmes. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 65(4), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2013.853685

Martin, B. C., McNally, J. J., & Kay, M. J. (2013). Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(2), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.03.002

Martina, R. A., & Göksen, S. (2022). Developing educational escape rooms for experiential entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 5(3), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127420969957

Matricano, D. (2022). Young entrepreneurs and skills mismatch in school-to-work transition: Empirical evidence from innovation processes managed in Italian NTBFs. International Journal of Manpower, 44(6), 1028–1045. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-09-2021-0547

Miao, C., Humphrey, R. H., Qian, S., & Pollack, J. M. (2018). Emotional intelligence and entrepreneurial intentions: An exploratory meta-analysis. Career Development International, 23(5), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-01-2018-0019

Mizikaci, F. (2006). A systems approach to program evaluation model for quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 14(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880610643601

Moriano, J. A., Gorgievski, M., Laguna, M., Stephan, U., & Zarafshani, K. (2012). A cross-cultural approach to understanding entrepreneurial intention. Journal of Career Development, 39(2), 162–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845310384481

Natarajan, S., McCullen, N., Lo, S., Coley, D., Arja, O. A., & Moran, F. (2021). Practice before theory? An approach for testing sequencing effects in pedagogical design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(5), 981–1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09579-w

Ni, H., & Ye, Y. (2018). Entrepreneurship education matters: Exploring secondary vocational school students’ entrepreneurial intention in China. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(5), 409–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0399-9

Ogunsola, J. A., Quadri, G. O., & Adigun, O. T. (2026). The strategic role of higher education in promoting entrepreneurship and managing innovation complexities: A conceptual framework analysis. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-026-00632-x

Onstenk, J. (2003). Entrepreneurship and vocational education. European Educational Research Journal, 2(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2003.2.1.12

Pan, S., Hafez, B., Iskandar, A., & Ming, Z. (2024). Integrating constructivist principles in an adaptive hybrid learning system for developing social entrepreneurship education among college students. Learning and Motivation, 87, 102023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102023

Paterson, T. A., Harms, P. D., Steel, P., & Credé, M. (2016). An assessment of the magnitude of effect sizes: Evidence from 30 years of meta-analysis in management. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23(1), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051815614321

Pawar, V. S., Desai, G. T., & Borotikar, M. (2026). Evaluating the impact of a project-based learning framework on overall skill development. Frontiers in Education, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1780665

Perry, A., & Karpova, E. (2017). Efficacy of teaching creative thinking skills: A comparison of multiple creativity assessments. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.02.017

Praslova, L. (2010). Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s four-level model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in higher education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 22(3), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-010-9098-7

Rideout, E. C., & Gray, D. O. (2013). Does entrepreneurship education really work? A review and methodological critique of the empirical literature on the effects of university-based entrepreneurship education. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(3), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12021

Roblin, N. P., Schunn, C., & McKenney, S. (2018). What are critical features of science curriculum materials that impact student and teacher outcomes? Science Education, 102(2), 260–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21328

Roehling, M. V., Wu, D., Choi, M. G., & Dulebohn, J. H. (2022). The effects of sexual harassment training on proximal and transfer training outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Personnel Psychology, 75(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12492

Samwel Mwasalwiba, E. (2010). Entrepreneurship education: A review of its objectives, teaching methods, and impact indicators. Education + Training, 52(1), 20–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911011017663

Satar, M. S., Alharthi, S., Omeish, F., Alshibani, S. M., & Saqib, N. (2024). Digital learning orientation and entrepreneurial competencies in graduates: Is blended learning sustainable? Sustainability, 16(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177794

Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), 597–599. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100

Scharfenberg, F., & Bogner, F. X. (2010). Instructional efficiency of changing cognitive load in an out-of-school laboratory. International Journal of Science Education, 32(6), 829–844. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902948862

Slemp, G. R., Lee, M. A., & Mossman, L. H. (2021). Interventions to support autonomy, competence, and relatedness needs in organizations: A systematic review with recommendations for research and practice. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(2), 427–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12338

Sulastri, S., Nazar, M., & Ichwana, I. (2024). Developing Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) course package to foster entrepreneurship among pre-service chemistry teachers. Tekno-Pedagogi: Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 14(2), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.22437/te