Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

Every manuscript submitted to the editorial board will undergo an initial selection process through an Initial Review by the Editorial Board. The manuscript will then be sent to Peer Reviewers and proceed to the next stage of selection through a Double-Blind Peer Review Process. Subsequently, the manuscript will be returned to the author for revision. This process takes a maximum of one month. For each manuscript, peer reviewers will evaluate both substantive and technical aspects.

The peer reviewers collaborating with JEEMBA are experts in the fields of economics, entrepreneurship, management, business, and accounting. They have extensive experience in managing and publishing prestigious journals, both domestically and internationally. All submitted manuscripts are reviewed by the editorial staff. Manuscripts evaluated by the editor as not meeting the journal’s criteria will be rejected immediately without external review. Manuscripts deemed potentially interesting to our readers are sent for double-blind peer review.

The editor then makes a decision based on the reviewers’ recommendations, which may include: rejection, revision required, or acceptance. The editor has the authority to decide which manuscripts submitted to the journal shall be published.

Review Process:

1. Author submits manuscript
2. Editor’s evaluation (some manuscripts are rejected or returned prior to the review process)
3. Double-blind peer review
4. Editor’s decision
5. Confirmation to the author

This journal uses Open Journal Systems 3.3.0.13, an open-source journal management and publishing software developed, supported, and freely distributed by the Public Knowledge Project under the GNU General Public License.