The Implementation of Environmental Management Accounting as a Business Strategy for Tourism on Rote Island: A Triple Bottom Line and Stakeholder Theory Approach

Authors

  • Indah Mutiara Universitas Nusa Cendana, Indonesia
  • Efandri Agustian Universitas Nusa Cendana, Indonesia
  • Minarni Anaci Dethan Universitas Nusa Cendana, Indonesia
  • Apriana H.J Fanggidae Universitas Nusa Cendana, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61255/jeemba.v4i5.1636

Keywords:

Environmental Management Accounting (EMA), Business Strategy, Sustainable Tourism, Triple Bottom Line, Stakeholder Theory

Abstract

Purpose – This study explores the implementation of Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) as a business strategy in the tourism service sector of Rote Island, Indonesia. It examines how EMA supports sustainable business practices from the perspectives of the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) and Stakeholder Theory while identifying the challenges faced by tourism businesses.

Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative case study approach was employed. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis involving hotel and homestay managers, tourism operators, local government officials, community representatives, and local SMEs. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Finding/Results – The findings reveal that EMA implementation remains at an early stage. Tourism businesses have adopted environmentally responsible practices, including energy and water conservation, waste reduction, and the use of local products, but environmental costs are not systematically recorded. From the TBL perspective, EMA enhances operational efficiency (profit), strengthens community participation (people), and supports environmental conservation (planet). Stakeholder Theory further explains that EMA improves managerial decision-making while fostering trust among tourists, local communities, government agencies, and business partners. Key challenges include limited awareness of EMA, inadequate environmental accounting systems, insufficient human resources, and limited institutional support.

Originality/Value – This study extends the EMA literature by integrating Triple Bottom Line and Stakeholder Theory within a tourism destination context, providing practical insights for developing sustainable tourism strategies in small island destinations.

Abstract views: 9 , PDF downloads: 6

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Astuti P, Nurdiana S. Akuntansi Lingkungan sebagai Strategi Perusahaan dalam Mencapai Keberlanjutan. J Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia. 2021;18(2):147-60. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2021.09

Aulia S, Kartawijaya I. Analisis Pengungkapan Triple Bottom Line dan Faktor yang Mempengaruhi: Lintas Negara Indonesia dan Jepang. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIV Aceh. 2011.

Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Rote Ndao. (2025). Kabupaten Rote Ndao dalam angka 2025. BPS Kabupaten Rote Ndao.

Bennett M, James P. The Green Bottom Line: Environmental Accounting for Management: Current Practice and Future Trends. Routledge; 2017.

Creswell JW. Research Design: Pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran. Terj. Achmad Fawaid dan Rianayati KP. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar; 2017.

Devi S, Budiasih IGN, Badera IDN. Pengaruh Pengungkapan Enterprise Risk Management dan Pengungkapan Intellectual Capital Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. J Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia. 2017;14(1):20-45.

Dianty, A., & Nurrahim, G. (2022). Pengaruh Penerapan Green Accounting dan Kinerja Lingkungan terhadap Kinerja Keuangan. Economics Professional in Action (E-PROFIT), 4(2), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.37278/eprofit.v4i2.529

Elkington J. Cannibals with forks: Triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone Publishing; 1997.

Freeman RE. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman; 1984.

Font X, Tapper R, Schwartz K, Kornilaki M. Sustainable tourism and the tourism ecological footprint. J Sustain Tour. 2008;16(3):303-21.

Gerged, A. M., Zahoor, N., & Cowton, C. J. (2024). Understanding the relationship between environmental management accounting and firm performance: The role of environmental innovation and stakeholder integration – Evidence from a developing country. Management Accounting Research, 62(February 2021), 100865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2023.100865

Halpiah, Hery AP. Implementasi Akuntansi Sebagai Strategi Bisnis UMKM. J Ilmiah Bisnis dan Ekonomi Asia. 2022;16(2):308-21. https://doi.org/10.32812/jibeka.v16i2.1034

Hanif, S., Ahmed, A., & Younas, N. (2023). Examining the impact of Environmental Management Accounting practices and green transformational leadership on corporate environmental performance; the mediating role of green process innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414(January), 137584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137584

Hörisch J, Freeman RE, Schaltegger S. Applying Stakeholder Theory in Sustainability Management: Links, Similarities, Dissimilarities, and a Conceptual Framework. Organ Environ. 2014;27(4):328-46.

Indah M, Arip S. Analysis of Tax Accounting Implementation at PT. Pou Yuen Indonesia. Edusight Int J Multidiscip Stud. 2024;1(4):1-9. https://doi.org/10.69726/eijoms.v1i4.68

Kasmawati. (2014). Implementasi Akuntansi Lingkungan Berdasarkan Teori Triple Bottom Line Pada Perusahaan - Perusahaan di Kawasan Industri Makassar. Artikel: Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Liem, V. T., & Hien, N. N. (2024). The impact of managers’ attitudes towards environmental management accounting and green competitive advantage in Vietnam manufacturers. Heliyon, 10(13), e33565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33565

Mowforth M, Munt I. Tourism and sustainability: Development, globalisation and new tourism in the Third World. Routledge; 2015.

Panji Putra, G. B. N & Larasdiputra, G. D. (2020). Penerapan Konsep Triple Bottom Line Accounting Di Desa Wisata Pelaga (Studi Kasus Pada Kelompok Usaha Tani Asparagus). Jurnal KRISNA: Kumpulan Riset Akuntansi; Vol. 11, No. 2;129-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.22225/kr.11.2.1419.129-136

Pflieger S, Fischer M, Kupfer T, Balzer S. Environmental management accounting (EMA) as the next step in the evolution of management accounting. J Clean Prod. 2005;13(12):119-32.

Putri, M. D., Palupi, D., & Wahyudi, B. (2024). Pengaruh Green Accounting Dan Kinerja Lingkungan Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan Sub Sektor Tambang Batubara. JURNAL MANEKSI, 13(2).

Ramadhani, K., Saputra, M. S., & Wahyuni, L. (2022). Pengaruh Penerapan Green Accounting dan Kinerja Lingkungan Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan dengan Tata Kelola Perusahaan Perusahaan sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi Trisakti, 9(2), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.25105/jat.v9i2.14559

Ramadhani T, Hakim M. Praktik Green Accounting pada Perusahaan Tambang di Indonesia. J Akuntansi dan Lingkungan. 2020;6(1):56-70. https://doi.org/10.25077/jal.2020.6.1.56

Schaltegger S, Burritt R. Contemporary environmental accounting: issues, concepts and practice. Routledge; 2017.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Cetakan Ke-25. Bandung: CV Alfabeta; 2019.

Talitha, N. (2022). Analisis Implementasi Environmental Management Accounting (EMA)Sebagai Bentuk Penerapan Eko-Efisiensi Dalam Mewujudkan Kinerja Ekonomi Perusahaan. DIPONEGORO JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING, 11(2), 1–11. http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting

Yagi, M., & Kokubu, K. (2020). A framework of sustainable consumption and production from the production perspective: Application to Thailand and Vietnam. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 124160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124160

Yudhanta. Akuntansi Lingkungan dan Akuntansi Manajemen Lingkungan: Suatu Komponen Dasar Strategi Bisnis. J Infestasi. 2009;5(1):1-21. https://doi.org/10.21107/infestasi.v5i1

Downloads

Published

2026-08-22

How to Cite

Mutiara, I., Agustian, E., Dethan, M. A., & Fanggidae, A. H. (2026). The Implementation of Environmental Management Accounting as a Business Strategy for Tourism on Rote Island: A Triple Bottom Line and Stakeholder Theory Approach. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management Business and Accounting, 4(5), 786–817. https://doi.org/10.61255/jeemba.v4i5.1636