Du Pont System Inside Measuring the Financial Performance of Food and Beverages Companies on the Indonesian Stock Exchange

Authors

  • Arini Lestari Aris Universitas Andi Djemma
  • Valentino Aris Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Siti Rahma Nurhaliza Universitas Andi Djemma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61255/jeemba.v1i2.65

Keywords:

du pont system analysis, financial performance, NPM, TATO, ROI

Abstract

This study aims to find out Du Pont System in measuring the financial performance of Food and Beverages. The research sample is 18 Food and Beverages listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2018-2020. Data collection is done by searching secondary data. Research results show the average change in NPM in the Food and Beverages industry in 2019 and 2020 is 1.52% and 0.8%. The average development of Total Assets Turn Over in the Food and Beverages industry in 2019 amounted to -0.03% and in 2020, it was 0.19%. And the company's financial performance based on the analysis of the Du Pont System method in the Food and Beverages industry in 2018-2020. Seen from the change in the average Return on Investment in 2019 of 1.59% and in 2020 by -3.91%. Rating The company's financial performance based on the analysis of the Du Pont System method in the Food and Beverages industry in 2012-2014. Judging from the value of Return on Investment PT. Multi Bintang Indonesia Tbk is ranked 1st in 2018-2019 with a Return On Investment value in 2018 of 42.39%, 2019 of 41.63%, and for 2020 rank 1 belongs to PT. Siantra Top Tbk with a Return On Investment value of 18.23%. Meanwhile PT. Sekar Bumi Tbk is ranked 18th with a Return on Investment value of 0.9% in 2018 and 0.05% in 2019. And in 2020 with a Return On Investment value of 0.31%.

Abstract views: 122 , PDF downloads: 135

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anindyajati, R. P. (2014). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Du Pont System (Studi Pada Ud. Az Zahra Food Periode Tahun 2011-2013). Brawijaya University.

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik.

Kasmir, S. E. (2015). Studi Kelayakan Bisnis: Edisi Revisi. Prenada Media.

Kawuri, A. L., Sutopo, W., & Rochani, R. (n.d.). Financial Performance Analysis Using the Du Pont System Method: A Case Study.

Krisnaryatko, N., & Kristianti, I. (2019). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan dengan Du Pont System. Jurnal Akuntansi Keuangan Dan Bisnis, 12(2), 77–86.

Limbong, A. H. (2021). Analisis Sistem du pont untuk mengukur kinerja keuangan perusahaan pada PT. mayora indah tbk yang terdaftar di bursa efek indonesia (BEI). Kumpulan Karya Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Sosial Sains, 2(02).

Lukman, S. (2009). Manajemen Keuangan Perusahaan: Konsep Aplikasi dalam Perencanaan, Pengawasan, dan Pengambilan Keputusan (Edisi Baru). Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Luviah, N. (2021). Pengaruh Rasio Keuangan Terhadap Pertumbuhan Laba Pada Perusahaan Sub Sektor Food And Beverages Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2017-2019. Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya.

Mubarak, W. (2021). Analisis Pengukuran Kinerja Keuangan Menggunakan Dupont System pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (Studi Kasus pada Industri Makanan dan Minuman). Universitas Medan Area.

Rahmani, S. A., & Mauluddi, H. A. (2020). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan dengan Menggunakan Du Pont System. Journal of Applied Islamic Economics and Finance, 1(1), 225–232.

Riyanto, B. (2010). Dasar-dasar Pembelanjaan Perusahaan, Yayasan Badan. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada.

Sa’adah, R. N. (2021). METODE PENELITIAN R&D (Research and Development) Kajian Teoretis dan Aplikatif. CV Literasi Nusantara Abadi.

Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-02

How to Cite

Aris, A. L., Aris, V., & Nurhaliza, S. R. (2023). Du Pont System Inside Measuring the Financial Performance of Food and Beverages Companies on the Indonesian Stock Exchange. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management Business and Accounting, 1(2), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.61255/jeemba.v1i2.65