The Role of Effectuation in Achieving Competitive Advantage: Testing the Mediating Role of Agility and Innovation Orientation

Authors

  • Maya Faridhotul Aini Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
  • Sri Palupi Prabandari Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
  • Radityo Putro Handrito Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61255/jeemba.v4i3.971

Keywords:

Agility, Innovation Orientation, Competitive Advantage, Smallholder Cocoa

Abstract

Purpose – This study examines how smallholder cocoa farmers in Indonesia achieve competitive advantage under high market uncertainty by investigating whether effectuation logic — an expertise-driven, non-predictive decision-making approach — functions as the cognitive foundation for building competitive superiority, and through which internal capability pathways this transformation occurs.

Design/Methodology/Approach – A quantitative cross-sectional survey of 260 smallholder cocoa farmers was conducted using purposive sampling across major Indonesian cocoa-producing regions. Data were analyzed using SEM-PLS (SmartPLS 4.0) with 5,000-subsample bootstrapping to test direct and mediation effects.

Findings/Results – Effectuation logic does not directly influence competitive advantage but significantly predicts individual agility (β = 0.466, p < 0.001) and innovation orientation (β = 0.202, p < 0.01). Both variables fully mediate the effectuation–competitive advantage relationship, with innovation orientation as the dominant pathway (β = 0.477, p < 0.001).

Originality/Value – This study introduces the cognitive-behavioral translation mechanism, establishing that effectuation generates competitive advantage exclusively through behavioral capabilities, not directly. It demonstrates that agility produces a negative competitive effect in buyer-dominated commodity markets challenging universal agility positivity assumptions  and extends dynamic capability theory to individual farmer-entrepreneurs in developing-economy agribusiness.

Abstract views: 1 , PDF downloads: 3

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ICCO (International Cocoa Organization). (2023). Annual report on the world cocoa economy. ICCO.

Almahamid, S., Awwad, A., & Mcadams, A. C. (2010). Effects of Organizational Agility and Knowledge Sharing on Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study in Jordan. In International Journal of Management (Vol. 27, Number 3).

Chandler, G. N., DeTienne, D. R., McKelvie, A., & Mumford, T. V. (2011). Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.006

Chatzoglou, P., & Chatzoudes, D. (2018). The role of innovation in building competitive advantages: an empirical investigation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(1), 44–69. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2017-0015

Chen, C. J. (2019). Developing a model for supply chain agility and innovativeness to enhance firms’ competitive advantage. Management Decision, 57(7), 1511–1534. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2017-1236

Christopher, M. (2000). The Agile Supply Chain Competing in Volatile Markets. In Industrial Marketing Management (Vol. 29).

Delladio, S., Caputo, A., Magrini, A., & Pellegrini, M. M. (2023). Italian entrepreneurial decision-making under lockdown: the path to resilience. Management Decision, 61(13), 272–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2022-1746

Directorate General of Plantations, Ministry of Agriculture Republic of Indonesia. (2022). Tree crop estate statistics of Indonesia 2020–2022: Cocoa. Ministry of Agriculture.

Distanont, A., & Khongmalai, O. (2020). The role of innovation in creating a competitive advantage. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 41(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.07.009

El Nsour, J. A. (2021). Investigating the impact of organizational agility on the competitive advantage. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 10(1), 153–157. https://doi.org/10.22495/JGRV10I1ART14

Gao, Y., Feng, Z., & Zhang, S. (2021). Managing supply chain resilience in the era of VUCA. In Frontiers of Engineering Management (Vol. 8, Number 3, pp. 465–470). Higher Education Press Limited Company. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-021-0164-2

Gölgeci, I., Arslan, A., Dikova, D., & Gligor, D. M. (2020). Resilient agility in volatile economies: institutional and organizational antecedents. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(1), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2019-0033

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). MULTIVARIATE DATA ANALYSIS EIGHTH EDITION. www.cengage.com/highered

Henseler, J. (2015). PLS-MGA: A Non-Parametric Approach to Partial Least Squares-based Multi-Group Analysis. PLS-MGA-A Non-Parametric Approach to Partial Least Squares-based Multi-Group Analysis. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/221649218

Huang, K. F., Wu, L. Y., Dyerson, R., & Chen, C. F. (2012). How does a technological firm develop its competitive advantage a dynamic capability perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(4), 644–653. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2011.2176340

Kalinic, I., Sarasvathy, S. D., & Forza, C. (2014). “Expect the unexpected”: Implications of effectual logic on the internationalization process. International Business Review, 23(3), 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.11.004

Koch, T., & Windsperger, J. (2017). Seeing through the network: Competitive advantage in the digital economy. Journal of Organization Design, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-017-0016-z

Roach, D. C., Ryman, J. A., & Makani, J. (2016). Effectuation, innovation and performance in SMEs: an empirical study. European Journal of Innovation Management, 19(2), 214–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2014-0119

Ruiz-Jiménez, J. M., Ruiz-Arroyo, M., & del Mar Fuentes-Fuentes, M. (2021). The impact of effectuation, causation, and resources on new venture performance: novice versus expert entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics, 57(4), 1761–1781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00371-7

Ryman, J. A., & Roach, D. C. (2024). Innovation, effectuation, and uncertainty. Innovation: Organization and Management, 26(2), 328–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2022.2117816

Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378020

Sarasvathy, S. D. (2004). Making it happen: Beyond theories of the firm to theories of firm design. Advances in Austrian Economics, 6, 287–302.

Sarasvathy, S. D. (2008). Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. In Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848440197

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (7th ed.). Wiley.

Sulistyo, H., & Ayuni, S. (2020). Competitive advantages of SMEs: The roles of innovation capability, entrepreneurial orientation, and social capital. Contaduria y Administracion, 65(1). https://doi.org/10.22201/FCA.24488410E.2020.1983

Taghvaee, S., & Talebi, K. (2023). Market orientation in uncertain environments: The enabling role of effectuation orientation in new product development. European Management Journal, 41(2), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.01.005

Tang, Y., Wu, L., & Zhang, J. (2025). The decision-making logic and organizational agility of SMEs in China: the moderating effect of decentralization. Asia Pacific Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2025.2506547

Usman, A., Yusuf, M., & Nursan, M. (2023). Supply chain analysis of cocoa seeds in Narmada, West Lombok, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1253(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1253/1/012076

Downloads

Published

2026-06-02

How to Cite

Aini, M. F., Prabandari, S. P., & Handrito, R. P. (2026). The Role of Effectuation in Achieving Competitive Advantage: Testing the Mediating Role of Agility and Innovation Orientation. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management Business and Accounting, 4(3), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.61255/jeemba.v4i3.971